From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Deduplicate MSR interception enabling and disabling
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:20:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aE9/ayZNEXoA/ZEE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d1e9a86-41aa-46dd-812b-308db5861b16@linux.intel.com>
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> @@ -388,21 +388,13 @@ void vmx_ept_load_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type);
>> void vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type);
>> +void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type, bool enable);
>>
>> u64 vmx_get_l2_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> u64 vmx_get_l2_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> gva_t vmx_get_untagged_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, unsigned int flags);
>>
>> -static inline void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr,
>> - int type, bool value)
>> -{
>> - if (value)
>> - vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, msr, type);
>> - else
>> - vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, msr, type);
>> -}
>> -
>> void vmx_update_cpu_dirty_logging(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> /*
>
>The change looks good to me.
>
>Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Thanks.
>
>Just curious, is there a preference on using these 3 interfaces? When
>should we use the disable/enable interfaces? When should be we use the set
>interface? or no preference?
I think the set API is to reduce boilerplate code. So, use the set API when
you need to perform conditional logic, such as
if (/*check guest/host caps*/)
//disable intercept
else
//enable intercept
otherwise, use the disable/enable APIs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 8:19 [PATCH 0/2] More cleanups to MSR interception code Chao Gao
2025-06-12 8:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Deduplicate MSR interception enabling and disabling Chao Gao
2025-06-12 11:25 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-06-12 12:04 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-13 1:37 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-16 2:20 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-06-24 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-24 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 10:57 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-12 8:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Simplify MSR interception logic for IA32_XSS MSR Chao Gao
2025-06-13 1:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-24 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 7:20 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] More cleanups to MSR interception code Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aE9/ayZNEXoA/ZEE@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®