From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@emfend.at>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dw9714: add support for powerdown pin
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:33:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aElNcDTLEJTcJs2s@kekkonen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611-dw9714-sd-v1-1-fb47ef5e736c@emfend.at>
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the patch.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 09:13:33AM +0200, Matthias Fend wrote:
> Add support for the powerdown pin (xSD), which can be used to put the VCM
> driver into power down mode. This is useful, for example, if the VCM
> driver's power supply cannot be controlled.
> The use of the powerdown pin is optional.
Please rewrap. Most editors can do it for you.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@emfend.at>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> index e45ba127069fc0848f1a06ceb789efd3c222c008..e923daeec9c574c5b8c7014b9e83fcbad47866c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ config VIDEO_AK7375
>
> config VIDEO_DW9714
> tristate "DW9714 lens voice coil support"
> - depends on I2C && VIDEO_DEV
> + depends on GPIOLIB && I2C && VIDEO_DEV
> select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> select V4L2_ASYNC
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c
> index 2ddd7daa79e28a2cde915b4173fa27e60d5a2b57..5b78c1848f80bc3e32df13d149f3865ff8defe6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> // Copyright (c) 2015--2017 Intel Corporation.
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ struct dw9714_device {
> struct v4l2_subdev sd;
> u16 current_val;
> struct regulator *vcc;
> + struct gpio_desc *powerdown_gpio;
> };
>
> static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> @@ -151,11 +153,20 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc))
> return PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc);
>
> + dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
> + "powerdown",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev,
> + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio),
> + "could not get powerdown gpio\n");
> +
> rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc);
> if (rval < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable vcc: %d\n", rval);
> return rval;
> }
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio, 0);
This seems to be redundant, you're already setting the GPIO low when
acquiring it. Typically the order is different, though: the regulator is
enabled first. Also related to the following comment.
>
> usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> @@ -185,6 +196,7 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return 0;
>
> err_cleanup:
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio, 1);
> regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc);
It'd be nice to have a single implementation of the power-on and power-off
sequences. Now there are two.
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9714_dev->ctrls_vcm);
> media_entity_cleanup(&dw9714_dev->sd.entity);
> @@ -200,6 +212,7 @@ static void dw9714_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev)) {
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio, 1);
> ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> @@ -234,6 +247,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10);
> }
>
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio, 1);
> ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", ret);
> @@ -262,6 +276,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dw9714_dev->powerdown_gpio, 0);
> +
> usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS;
>
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 7:13 Matthias Fend
2025-06-11 9:33 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2025-06-11 12:15 ` Matthias Fend
2025-06-11 12:28 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aElNcDTLEJTcJs2s@kekkonen.localdomain \
--to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.fend@emfend.at \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®