From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECB31922D3; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750097719; cv=none; b=X/LB5oRGODkdeBMI3NX2tpwfMCQPz6MTwufsbCqkU534cwFI9ba+lK8Fjc5fujmTHRXdSTMsfLPYVoClqtk5D5X4ld+eypoWk6BoDQL0032YZokhalDF6c99v3O0aftq5Yg9PIou9YI2A9hzmsiwOrFbpc1qyOKHFfLl/QXTT10= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750097719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yA7nQY6EB3++WTiYEV3GhWn+708ii7DZS9WFb6/7CHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G83sY7LcVscC5thGD52wVi4Y8H1d5TE3Mp7ndcWDscNGKh28nOq8tMMv9dknXYCAYTxeB44uN7DwqMtIwGQZ4hTf9R6wd3fv2kI7bUZHOr34QYp/6hTLXWMcHkmDY8fPyIbpwMd1H3TzWZQKngYUe70B8Tdntwl+YUjUsVQOEoc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OP2hkkbH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OP2hkkbH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF5CAC4CEF1; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:15:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750097718; bh=yA7nQY6EB3++WTiYEV3GhWn+708ii7DZS9WFb6/7CHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OP2hkkbH8ofhfta0N/V3Cd6gPLQX7bBJtzWLbXa6/z12V/OKP+hrdGdyL0OVh0Bbl 0iDhqKqww7fOB6i6ybbv+R5ZKx9TJJP6OB8xVO5ip9SWlDfpSCZ6v05dTYyUqFVC4y DoQJPoCn2xAGql4W/aDC/vktQtbm1DGDz0d0ne6yb2t8aHNiafPQYhDUeNL9txbsGV /SsUF9NiZAxMU1PuUiURQe6QrO02J1GurlZf43Aez1IZIfF0gtIWiuhWjHnb1+9Qj4 0OJwVkYDi6MLVY6YM2w68jS9SEtKuOLI45uaml0aH/bovsFIU2bzu69YuAphARxJFR NpwhVu6tJBUpw== Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:15:17 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Andrew Morton , JP Kobryn , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Vlastimil Babka , Alexei Starovoitov , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Harry Yoo , Yosry Ahmed , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Meta kernel team Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated Message-ID: References: <20250611221532.2513772-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250611221532.2513772-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Hello, On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Shakeel Butt (4): > cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated > cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe > cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks > memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi() The patches look good to me. How should it be routed? Should I take all four, just the first three or would it better to route all through -mm? Thanks. -- tejun