mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>, Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
Cc: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>,
	Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] interconnect: avoid memory allocation when 'icc_bw_lock' is held
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:43:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFK0a8AIOl704DpP@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529-icc-bw-lockdep-v1-1-3d714b6a9374@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 04:46:22PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> The 'icc_bw_lock' mutex is introduced in commit af42269c3523
> ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim") in order
> to decouple serialization of bw aggregation from codepaths
> that require memory allocation.
> 
> However commit d30f83d278a9 ("interconnect: core: Add dynamic
> id allocation support") added a devm_kasprintf() call into a
> path protected by the 'icc_bw_lock' which causes this lockdep
> warning (at least on the IPQ9574 platform):
> 
>     ======================================================
>     WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>     6.15.0-next-20250529 #0 Not tainted
>     ------------------------------------------------------
>     swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
>     ffffffc081df57d8 (icc_bw_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: icc_init+0x8/0x108
> 
>     but task is already holding lock:
>     ffffffc081d7db10 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: icc_init+0x28/0x108
> 
>     which lock already depends on the new lock.

Thanks for fixing this. I get a similar splat with sc8280xp and the
icc_ism_l3 driver since 6.16-rc1.

Georgi, this is a regression that prevents lockdep from being used on a
bunch of Qualcomm platforms and should be fixed in mainline ASAP (e.g.
to avoid further locking issues from being introduced).

> Move the memory allocation part of the code outside of the protected
> path to eliminate the warning. Also add a note about why it is moved
> to there,
> 
> Fixes: d30f83d278a9 ("interconnect: core: Add dynamic id allocation support")
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/interconnect/core.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> index 1a41e59c77f85a811f78986e98401625f4cadfa3..acdb3b8f1e54942dbb1b71ec2b170b08ad709e6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> @@ -1023,6 +1023,16 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider)
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
> +
> +	if (node->id >= ICC_DYN_ID_START) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Memory allocation must be done outside of codepaths
> +		 * protected by icc_bw_lock.
> +		 */
> +		node->name = devm_kasprintf(provider->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s@%s",
> +					    node->name, dev_name(provider->dev));
> +	}

The node name has already been set by the caller and the node has not
been added yet, so I think you should move this before taking the
icc_lock.

> +
>  	mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
>  
>  	node->provider = provider;

With that addressed, feel free to add my:

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>

Johan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <TIkPOGVjPeCjPzjVtlSb6V5CIcpaXf2-6WG6HjAyaOW59Hj01-9VK7Z8DKadakOKr6fJeQICi6h0Z8mft9DQyg==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-05-29 14:46 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-30  9:16   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-03  9:15     ` Gabor Juhos
2025-06-03 10:01       ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-18 12:50         ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-18 13:28           ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-18 12:43   ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-06-18 19:38     ` Gabor Juhos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFK0a8AIOl704DpP@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
    --cc=djakov@kernel.org \
    --cc=j4g8y7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®