From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU, system_dfl_wq and system_percpu_wq
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:23:59 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFmpzwNlwP3LVs9O@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAofZF7xVETGVzrpHdMghcGDwNvw3jVumFWwWMqd+tq4Gm+m=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 06:13:09PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Just a quick question Tejun: when do you expect to receive the other patches?
> Should I wait till the next rc1?
>
> I just want to check the work again, but they are ready.
So, I can route the patches through the wq tree but I shouldn't do so unless
subsystem maintainers want to do so for the specific subsystem. Waiting for
rc1 is an option but not the only one. You can send out subsystem-specific
patchdes to the subsystem maintainers and me cc'd with:
- Explanation on what's going on and why.
- What needs to happen if the subsystem wants to route the patch (pull the
wq branch with the prep changes).
- Offer the option to route the changes through a wq branch.
There are no hard rules on how to do this but it's all about making
logistics understandable and easy for the involved subsystems.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-14 13:35 Marco Crivellari
2025-06-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-06-23 23:49 ` Hillf Danton
2025-06-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Workqueue: add new WQ_PERCPU flag Marco Crivellari
2025-06-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] [Doc] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU Marco Crivellari
2025-06-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU, system_dfl_wq and system_percpu_wq Tejun Heo
2025-06-17 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-17 18:14 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-17 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-20 16:13 ` Marco Crivellari
2025-06-23 19:23 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFmpzwNlwP3LVs9O@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®