From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
urezki@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com,
neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 2/5] rcu: Protect ->defer_qs_iw_pending from data race
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 13:27:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aG5SNJpn60Sz9px3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709104118.15532-3-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Le Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:11:15PM +0530, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org a écrit :
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> On kernels built with CONFIG_IRQ_WORK=y, when rcu_read_unlock() is
> invoked within an interrupts-disabled region of code [1], it will invoke
> rcu_read_unlock_special(), which uses an irq-work handler to force the
> system to notice when the RCU read-side critical section actually ends.
> That end won't happen until interrupts are enabled at the soonest.
>
> In some kernels, such as those booted with rcutree.use_softirq=y, the
> irq-work handler is used unconditionally.
>
> The per-CPU rcu_data structure's ->defer_qs_iw_pending field is
> updated by the irq-work handler and is both read and updated by
> rcu_read_unlock_special(). This resulted in the following KCSAN splat:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler / rcu_read_unlock_special
>
> read to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 90 on cpu 8:
> rcu_read_unlock_special+0x175/0x260
> __rcu_read_unlock+0x92/0xa0
> rt_spin_unlock+0x9b/0xc0
> __local_bh_enable+0x10d/0x170
> __local_bh_enable_ip+0xfb/0x150
> rcu_do_batch+0x595/0xc40
> rcu_cpu_kthread+0x4e9/0x830
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0
> kthread+0x3bd/0x410
> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> write to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 88 on cpu 8:
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler+0x1e/0x30
> irq_work_single+0xaf/0x160
> run_irq_workd+0x91/0xc0
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0
> kthread+0x3bd/0x410
> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> no locks held by irq_work/8/88.
> irq event stamp: 200272
> hardirqs last enabled at (200272): [<ffffffffb0f56121>] finish_task_switch+0x131/0x320
> hardirqs last disabled at (200271): [<ffffffffb25c7859>] __schedule+0x129/0xd70
> softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0ee093f>] copy_process+0x4df/0x1cc0
> softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The problem is that irq-work handlers run with interrupts enabled, which
> means that rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() could be interrupted,
> and that interrupt handler might contain an RCU read-side critical
> section, which might invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(). In the strict
> KCSAN mode of operation used by RCU, this constitutes a data race on
> the ->defer_qs_iw_pending field.
>
> This commit therefore disables interrupts across the portion of the
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() that updates the ->defer_qs_iw_pending
> field. This suffices because this handler is not a fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 10:41 [PATCH rcu 0/5] RCU changes for v6.17 neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 10:41 ` [PATCH rcu 1/5] rcu: Robustify rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 10:41 ` [PATCH rcu 2/5] rcu: Protect ->defer_qs_iw_pending from data race neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2025-07-09 10:41 ` [PATCH rcu 3/5] rcu: Enable rcu_normal_wake_from_gp on small systems neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 11:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-09 10:41 ` [PATCH rcu 4/5] Documentation/kernel-parameters: Update rcu_normal_wake_from_gp doc neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 11:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-09 10:41 ` [PATCH rcu 5/5] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 12:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-10 19:41 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aG5SNJpn60Sz9px3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®