From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:05:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGPrFnDxG4W7S9Ym@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250630-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v3-0-b997be9b7137@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:37:07PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Following our discussion[1], here's a proposal for extending the sysfs
> interface with attributes not referring to GPIO lines by their global
> numbers in a backward compatible way.
>
> Long story short: there is now a new class device for each GPIO chip.
> It's called chipX where X is the ID of the device as per the driver
> model and it lives next to the old gpiochipABC where ABC is the GPIO
> base. Each new chip class device has a pair of export/unexport
> attributes which work similarly to the global ones under /sys/class/gpio
> but take hardware offsets within the chip as input, instead of the
> global numbers. Finally, each exported line appears at the same time as
> the global /sys/class/gpio/gpioABC as well as per-chip
> /sys/class/gpio/chipX/gpioY sysfs group.
>
> The series contains the implementation of a parallel GPIO chip entry not
> containing the base GPIO number in the name and the corresponding sysfs
> attribute group for each exported line that lives under the new chip
> class device as well as a way to allow to compile out the legacy parts
> leaving only the new elements of the sysfs ABI.
>
> This series passes the compatibility tests I wrote while working on the
> user-space compatibility layer for sysfs[2].
It seems I never expressed my overall opinion about this. I think the poking
sysfs and making it working with a new schema won't solve the issues that
character device was developed to target. If so, doing this just brings yet
another broken interface. I would be happy to be mistaken!
If I am mistaken, I would like to see a summary here that explains that clearly
that the new sysfs approach does not inherit design flaws of the original
implementation.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMRc=McUCeZcU6co1aN54rTudo+JfPjjForu4iKQ5npwXk6GXA@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://github.com/brgl/gpio-sysfs-compat-tests
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-30 12:37 Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] gpio: sysfs: use gpiod_is_equal() to compare GPIO descriptors Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 8:05 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 8:05 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 13:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 13:39 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 14:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 8:06 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-30 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 8:09 ` Linus Walleij
2025-07-01 14:05 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-07-02 3:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Kent Gibson
2025-07-02 9:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-02 10:12 ` Kent Gibson
2025-07-02 10:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-02 11:01 ` Kent Gibson
2025-07-02 11:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-02 12:42 ` Kent Gibson
2025-07-02 12:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-02 11:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-02 13:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 8:21 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGPrFnDxG4W7S9Ym@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®