mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: runtime: Take active children into account in pm_runtime_get_if_in_use()
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 07:24:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHYCRvz0ohgi2xUk@kekkonen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12700973.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net>

Hi Rafael,

Thanks for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 12:41:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> For all practical purposes, there is no difference between the situation
> in which a given device is not ignoring children and its active child
> count is nonzero and the situation in which its runtime PM usage counter
> is nonzero.  However, pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will only increment the
> device's usage counter and return 1 in the latter case.
> 
> For consistency, make it do so in the former case either by adjusting
> pm_runtime_get_conditional() and update the related kerneldoc comments
> accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: c0ef3df8dbae ("PM: runtime: Simplify pm_runtime_get_if_active() usage")

I guess this should be:

Fixes: c111566bea7c ("PM: runtime: Add pm_runtime_get_if_active()")

Should this also be cc'd to stable?

Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -1203,10 +1203,12 @@
>   *
>   * Return -EINVAL if runtime PM is disabled for @dev.
>   *
> - * Otherwise, if the runtime PM status of @dev is %RPM_ACTIVE and either
> - * @ign_usage_count is %true or the runtime PM usage counter of @dev is not
> - * zero, increment the usage counter of @dev and return 1. Otherwise, return 0
> - * without changing the usage counter.
> + * Otherwise, if its runtime PM status is %RPM_ACTIVE and (1) @ign_usage_count
> + * is set, or (2) @dev is not ignoring children and its active child count is
> + * nonero, or (3) the runtime PM usage counter of @dev is not zero, increment
> + * the usage counter of @dev and return 1.
> + *
> + * Otherwise, return 0 without changing the usage counter.
>   *
>   * If @ign_usage_count is %true, this function can be used to prevent suspending
>   * the device when its runtime PM status is %RPM_ACTIVE.
> @@ -1228,7 +1230,8 @@
>  		retval = -EINVAL;
>  	} else if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_ACTIVE) {
>  		retval = 0;
> -	} else if (ign_usage_count) {
> +	} else if (ign_usage_count || (!dev->power.ignore_children &&
> +		   atomic_read(&dev->power.child_count) > 0)) {
>  		retval = 1;
>  		atomic_inc(&dev->power.usage_count);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1261,10 +1264,16 @@
>   * @dev: Target device.
>   *
>   * Increment the runtime PM usage counter of @dev if its runtime PM status is
> - * %RPM_ACTIVE and its runtime PM usage counter is greater than 0, in which case
> - * it returns 1. If the device is in a different state or its usage_count is 0,
> - * 0 is returned. -EINVAL is returned if runtime PM is disabled for the device,
> - * in which case also the usage_count will remain unmodified.
> + * %RPM_ACTIVE and its runtime PM usage counter is greater than 0 or it is not
> + * ignoring children and its active child count is nonzero.  1 is returned in
> + * this case.
> + *
> + * If @dev is in a different state or it is not in use (that is, its usage
> + * counter is 0, or it is ignoring children, or its active child count is 0),
> + * 0 is returned.
> + *
> + * -EINVAL is returned if runtime PM is disabled for the device, in which case
> + * also the usage counter of @dev is not updated.
>   */
>  int pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev)
>  {
> 
> 

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-09 10:41 Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-09 11:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-07-09 12:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-09 12:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-09 13:24       ` Ulf Hansson
2025-07-15  7:24 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2025-07-15 12:46   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-15 13:18     ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHYCRvz0ohgi2xUk@kekkonen.localdomain \
    --to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®