From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f202.google.com (mail-pg1-f202.google.com [209.85.215.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B527084A2B for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752850905; cv=none; b=ap7GliP3LbTlHlLxKpWOD3IoGx9Se86Mn1ng6VzX0l/4QUZKAFSzHuydEYwiS05Dtrr4lQ3n7KPT6KiL3AgDhagLsx1Y4p5iPHAdajp4LB9e0WZuq98UoyFdepOwqwO+zg2Lal93JrruzuWw5Pd5733MOWQQi/mgH/XvA93sZmk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752850905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WgvwxniVn+OVr5zoobK2/58Tn2Xyi++2EmWaQbvmIKw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=Ldc2DWA/6Fkew6U9A6RtgeyBlxtS5O8WFvCmrLBbmYPNIEGH/gGab2glg50Z7uctLsI9O/iyvHdvF4AQEkWwi3IssJoIYpPkjBJY6uSFHRjYDhqZ7J9cZNhJIJfOYEjahCWOjguhIoC3qNIjAqIrwVROSXtAJhQWrfviq/XlPgM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=GiVxeIfV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="GiVxeIfV" Received: by mail-pg1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b3f2e05fb78so896536a12.1 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:01:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1752850903; x=1753455703; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=geYaB9rXHQSUMsGWg9gaauTb+O/4/i92BVIedWT6AZU=; b=GiVxeIfVyxqsHMXvKQNglT8byfqLqhsr8TFezB0z6QsfAnCdlwD9vb+SLwUIBkj8VH G9mw0itZdD2s99CKH9rnII+FwUW4FytmgPZknM9U2Q0xS75faAdSYQ6SMb7F2SOd7x7T Mjg/79baIliQLst2hUqiNm7uONPunG+91frhzotQBtI29LtsQ5bPEuJsm2PfUd3N0pCf 5Y7Iro4cBzFHf7AvPfSbWc96cLO01SlVFrKLEafSG5EgM+R6xaYfiqRLVkmBWSMFxm2B XdDmYxih7qULecOtKZwtWfg3IhSaSwsGtZkX/mFqq2pN7geuwfUdfIk/p6YglHj+Z5+u pNVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752850903; x=1753455703; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=geYaB9rXHQSUMsGWg9gaauTb+O/4/i92BVIedWT6AZU=; b=JsszdXBcp9DEN92Ce8PFD7Rir8Ok2Cu2N79oe3HcmFyBHYvPGjcR+qS7pwv1sG74MJ MNUqUM9KPiK4rw70FNrQ58VOmTAZi8gPAzSZXe1/E8sSeGPZw5Z5fdkh6EUamx42L95C 6NdG09lSsu2UI8MauJJI+FPgn3obLtdPFmM4+yQ2+jr3cnmO8VSMbrD6jTUdMXMg7vHO nFchCBHQNQeN2iLIOBGaoo/O9n1PGTdthT4iuunbe1d8QEf5CXfMjzcbYekLJkNbUext AVEdIoKMqnMyhupsaS3kkkgM6awb/2g5gZ5z/89Ngk7HiHNwppBmVnESkz0U4Qv6R10B SvKQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWSBtGIPDEh4LE4e3BM9SUiqy92W1D/+YJnUtCeOl/HM3e04JD332Dt1rMhKHs8HyarIk7Ef9sC9TfvsPM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7LItdsBw2V925+PLrRNnT73ED8Xw/+d8RLBF4IdXhUmmqVEkw m4DSU/nnPbcCS1UsJeOsex+qHsVfzv01E0cv0WAiD+iO+gg5ysnyLwrI/QOJTKqR16gZnPdwNl1 81uI+Yg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHdKCPaGZUvEghSMEa/uSwnZ5WlkHcmcoPjFppjTidPL81orqXlF7aHA7YyyC6gZbDkNyDDlRyVDxc= X-Received: from pjbqd6.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90b:3cc6:b0:311:eb65:e269]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6300:6e17:b0:238:3f54:78e7 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-2383f548d14mr11815528637.45.1752850903016; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:01:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250716110737.2513665-1-keirf@google.com> <20250716110737.2513665-3-keirf@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: vgic: Explicitly implement vgic_dist::ready ordering From: Sean Christopherson To: Keir Fraser Cc: Yao Yuan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Auger , Oliver Upton , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Fri, Jul 18, 2025, Keir Fraser wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 01:44:48PM +0800, Yao Yuan wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:07:35AM +0800, Keir Fraser wrote: > > > In preparation to remove synchronize_srcu() from MMIO registration, > > > remove the distributor's dependency on this implicit barrier by > > > direct acquire-release synchronization on the flag write and its > > > lock-free check. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 11 ++--------- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c > > > index 502b65049703..bc83672e461b 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c > > > @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm) > > > gpa_t dist_base; > > > int ret = 0; > > > > > > - if (likely(dist->ready)) > > > + if (likely(smp_load_acquire(&dist->ready))) > > > return 0; > > > > > > mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); > > > @@ -598,14 +598,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm) > > > goto out_slots; > > > } > > > > > > - /* > > > - * kvm_io_bus_register_dev() guarantees all readers see the new MMIO > > > - * registration before returning through synchronize_srcu(), which also > > > - * implies a full memory barrier. As such, marking the distributor as > > > - * 'ready' here is guaranteed to be ordered after all vCPUs having seen > > > - * a completely configured distributor. > > > - */ > > > - dist->ready = true; > > > + smp_store_release(&dist->ready, true); > > > > No need the store-release and load-acquire for replacing > > synchronize_srcu_expedited() w/ call_srcu() IIUC: > > > > Tree SRCU on SMP: > > call_srcu() > > __call_srcu() > > srcu_gp_start_if_needed() > > __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() > > #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE > > smp_mb__before_atomic() // __smp_mb() on ARM64, do nothing on x86. > > #else > > __srcu_read_unlock() > > smp_mb() > > #endif > > I don't think it's nice to depend on an implementation detail of > kvm_io_bus_register_dev() and, transitively, on implementation details > of call_srcu(). > > kvm_vgic_map_resources() isn't called that often and can afford its > own synchronization. +1