From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq()
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:39:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIzRkEZLGSFybEfd@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801141741.355059-1-christian.loehle@arm.com>
Hi Christian,
thanks for tackling this! Comments below.
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:17:38PM +0100, Christian Loehle wrote:
> scx_bpf_cpu_rq() currently allows accessing struct rq fields without
> holding the associated rq.
> It is being used by scx_cosmos, scx_flash, scx_lavd, scx_layered, and
> scx_tickless. Fortunately it is only ever used to fetch rq->curr.
> So provide an alternative scx_bpf_remote_curr() that doesn't expose
> struct rq and harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() by ensuring we hold the rq lock.
>
> This also simplifies scx code from:
>
> rq = scx_bpf_cpu_rq(cpu);
> if (!rq)
> return;
> p = rq->curr
> if (!p)
> return;
> /* ... Do something with p */
>
> into:
>
> p = scx_bpf_remote_curr(cpu);
> if (!p)
> return;
> /* ... Do something with p */
To be 100% correct I think we should do something similar to
bpf_task_from_pid(), acquire a reference to the task and release it via
bpf_task_release().
Basically:
p = scx_bpf_remote_curr(cpu);
if (!p)
return;
/* ... Do something with p */
bpf_task_release(p);
Thanks
-Andrea
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 14:17 Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched_ext: Mark scx_bpf_cpu_rq as NULL returnable Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Provide scx_bpf_remote_curr() Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:47 ` Andrea Righi
2025-08-01 14:58 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext: Guarantee rq lock on scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:51 ` Andrea Righi
2025-08-01 14:54 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-01 14:39 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIzRkEZLGSFybEfd@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®