From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add an usdt_o2 test case in selftests to cover SIB handling logic
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:00:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ2lxyUYfQkfQW2-@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814064504.103401-3-phoenix500526@163.com>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 06:45:04AM +0000, Jiawei Zhao wrote:
> When using GCC on x86-64 to compile an usdt prog with -O1 or higher
> optimization, the compiler will generate SIB addressing mode for global
> array and PC-relative addressing mode for global variable,
> e.g. "1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)" and "-1@4+t1(%rip)".
>
> In this patch:
> - add usdt_o2 test case to cover SIB addressing usdt argument spec
> handling logic
hi,
on my setup (gcc15) the test generates ust register argument:
stapsdt 0x0000002a NT_STAPSDT (SystemTap probe descriptors)
Provider: test
Name: usdt1
Location: 0x00000000007677ce, Base: 0x00000000035bc728, Semaphore: 0x0000000000000000
Arguments: 8@%rax
7677c6: 48 8b 04 c5 20 49 9c mov 0x39c4920(,%rax,8),%rax
7677cd: 03
7677ce: 90 nop
I'm not sure if there's reliable solution to generate SIB argument from gcc,
maybe we could generate all in assembly, but that might get complicated
jirka
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c | 37 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 4863106034df..24ff1a329625 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := $$(error no BPF objects should be built)
> TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS :=
> $(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_maps))
>
> +
> # Define test_verifier test runner.
> # It is much simpler than test_maps/test_progs and sufficiently different from
> # them (e.g., test.h is using completely pattern), that it's worth just
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f02dcf5188ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>. */
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +
> +#include "../sdt.h"
> +#include "test_usdt_o2.skel.h"
> +
> +#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__clang__)
> +__attribute__((optimize("O2")))
> +#endif
> +
> +#define test_value 0xFEDCBA9876543210ULL
> +#define SEC(name) __attribute__((section(name), used))
> +
> +int lets_test_this(int);
> +static volatile __u64 array[1] = {test_value};
> +
> +static __always_inline void trigger_func(void)
> +{
> + /* Base address + offset + (index * scale) */
> + for (volatile int i = 0; i <= 0; i++)
> + STAP_PROBE1(test, usdt1, array[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static void basic_sib_usdt(void)
> +{
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_usdt_opts, opts);
> + struct test_usdt_o2 *skel;
> + struct test_usdt_o2__bss *bss;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = test_usdt_o2__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> + return;
> +
> + bss = skel->bss;
> + bss->my_pid = getpid();
> +
> + err = test_usdt_o2__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* usdt1 won't be auto-attached */
> + opts.usdt_cookie = 0xcafedeadbeeffeed;
> + skel->links.usdt1 = bpf_program__attach_usdt(skel->progs.usdt1,
> + 0 /*self*/, "/proc/self/exe",
> + "test", "usdt1", &opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.usdt1, "usdt1_link"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + trigger_func();
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_called, 1, "usdt1_called");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_cookie, 0xcafedeadbeeffeed, "usdt1_cookie");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_cnt, 1, "usdt1_arg_cnt");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg, test_value, "usdt1_arg");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_ret, 0, "usdt1_arg_ret");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_size, sizeof(array[0]), "usdt1_arg_size");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_usdt_o2__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +
> +
> +void test_usdt_o2(void)
> +{
> + basic_sib_usdt();
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..14602aa54578
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
> +
> +int my_pid;
> +
> +int usdt1_called;
> +u64 usdt1_cookie;
> +int usdt1_arg_cnt;
> +int usdt1_arg_ret;
> +u64 usdt1_arg;
> +int usdt1_arg_size;
> +
> +SEC("usdt")
> +int usdt1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> + long tmp;
> +
> + if (my_pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32))
> + return 0;
> +
> + __sync_fetch_and_add(&usdt1_called, 1);
> +
> + usdt1_cookie = bpf_usdt_cookie(ctx);
> + usdt1_arg_cnt = bpf_usdt_arg_cnt(ctx);
> +
> + usdt1_arg_ret = bpf_usdt_arg(ctx, 0, &tmp);
> + usdt1_arg = (u64)tmp;
> + usdt1_arg_size = bpf_usdt_arg_size(ctx, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 6:45 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/2] libbpf: fix USDT SIB argument handling causing unrecognized register error Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-14 6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/2] " Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-14 6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add an usdt_o2 test case in selftests to cover SIB handling logic Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-14 9:00 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-08-14 13:59 ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-14 14:45 ` 赵佳炜
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-07 2:34 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/2] libbpf: fix USDT SIB argument handling causing unrecognized register error Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-07 2:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add an usdt_o2 test case in selftests to cover SIB handling logic Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-14 0:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ2lxyUYfQkfQW2-@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phoenix500526@163.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®