From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2AEC2E2854 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754937795; cv=none; b=ifBXZHgYGsQ370Dlcdw38QXVzGh9jtiPq/xv1y6bwsdhrt4T+k7bAvmSzDUktk2qcbcBnc91tzzju11jD1AGrM/v1kdeeci4YItzGSWH3QcUhCOPfoBOhsQmVCpdzLLiYkdxiCPUQhYoiwT5Yoelfp/7iHxT4sfkgLFr9JnYtiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754937795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ehBzBrmpO6FFQHQkSJbU+IofYnPjC/m9CjtUMtSr3h0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F9HOOPuZJwmk5j5i+XbfJN2ef7X4XVkC1b7P1udIM8V4W/FZwJDaLyXeO9/NB0MsF4n6393/NzOuFlUVZkjgJ2/GeM72YMi3sb/RoUz/2l68eKck8S48AeqqWqsuZC9tQeNW7w8+iNxcpKUZGh2Cbq8hlHv3oVVplwximgBX63o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=3PvomAh9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="3PvomAh9" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242d3be5bdfso20505ad.1 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1754937793; x=1755542593; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NMlOINz7dBI+CDnsCWZItvlMGoxrFbP7xNOE0bRZ508=; b=3PvomAh9dqdQ69rJTOSXAmlfxkqciRrRVQRopG0nhcWtYVTy9df6q57ktQiZBcuVAZ M2EoQuccX/x/jjt+AFz7KY7x0mnDVw1Le0JZptWzUxlj+fnulPN2pLGQLdfmPdwjaSBv D0kvdxkXYVN1eLRG2M+YlY6i4nr8q6In3pYebDYEYQ/jE7GYtjeTVC728cbOhKH5vm2r 3obBivJIw4WUCo6O8zwE3E624GwZpvJJ+sNAbAWsZMZhHisshZkmktjlblB7adGIrczv 1IY/aUVs9RbQFdlhBEABRHSukgHBvedFHmY8b96jqqWcx25xdTi0Ul/xmkpF+C0df4c+ lNYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754937793; x=1755542593; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NMlOINz7dBI+CDnsCWZItvlMGoxrFbP7xNOE0bRZ508=; b=cVnJgQIQaEvVb+hWLuBlLWT0ViMqCYTA/DiZfdodGlae+k4NtN3B/YyjGeOWt5GMvg AcJ1YBwjplhkvOrKUCplm+o+QNOo16pJfHweEeCTclJklT6QOwJ2OgSZDNB4jFtzQi9u LKr3D0l7GRVbK63UgqyAyWgtDAKxe5wdqLoV/MmeK7Rz54x7f08FPD3Ux+LahIfPG6tv V6ghqYbgYSHF8eME7cKp27uIyK/IgljkDaQFAvrAH21QjluzCKyzCodLZGqAK5hz6CAS IiC9V5PVBgXehkZL3sFa5JsksGKt++9EC9q4WByqlGdauaQcdjwGxxeYBVM4VwvsE8U9 VhIg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUIZsDDzyyfbIUaNmocevCWIVESruBJdkEOEUdGHnkPIwhR00EglJuHZg/oIDhLQS9BxdaAOo/le3AbMoI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyQpRDdUyJaCi8IzkT/tqv5rcOi8GEH2IYtzjR/03BiwD1Lcpws xh13UB3L8dEcP4HpdAoK3blTARgp9Y5Ro4kvKUNax6hhfNmhuxqV33BdJ4Sv5hDmWw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctguoxXlRHiahZQOmrdmv0SEaMW8B20rOjwwvMB7cqeyPuWIYNvg3TasvSm1bf HkfiViMNzfNffIkuiVjYBWFDfrGwLASisaiYRP7hhCl57SP0b4N7gFKZTfBVOCT9xhc6Jv/rpN9 BQAZpcu3O4XiZMmrrWOsypHGiGDsMOKw9ORfTBgmTRCYcTozCcm8cUSrXZvEHXTqYa0u/X3S6tm YbYn0kGRgoDE0xXs5P+h9HQgkxIY/aYYGSqWH6WGPjTkAlsPSmbBt9g9QYNTxN0vabpqOPv6TSR ilwoi9DGZByFoIy/OzIhllG4TlNFpwQzIm2JWiDheVxxloWrURt7n+LQK4Z9gPm9iaaU1gbY2+C 8+fk01n8c4h/MnVhKl83UA6nMasVmdYzK43ElGV6qI/n9tKmFDPc2D88WA458QA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFAj4RXchFFM1jNvlG+vT/TTAhPz8TKJKfTAJWiNhb+yc1od3gDo0I+qfsY9ggR5R/DTUlTOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:234d:b0:23d:eb0f:f49 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242fd374f19mr359875ad.14.1754937792802; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (167.212.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.212.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-321611da39esm15268859a91.2.2025.08.11.11.43.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:08 +0000 From: Prashant Malani To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Beata Michalska , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jie Zhan , Ionela Voinescu , Ben Segall , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , open list , "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , z00813676 , sudeep.holla@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs Message-ID: References: <20250722032727.zmdwj6ztitkmr4pf@vireshk-i7> <20250731111324.vv6vsh35enk3gg4h@vireshk-i7> <20250801044340.6ycskhhkzenkzt7a@vireshk-i7> <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7> On Aug 11 11:35, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 06-08-25, 17:19, Prashant Malani wrote: > > So, do we have consensus that the idle check is acceptable as proposed? > > (Just want to make sure this thread doesn't get lost given another thread > > has forked off in this conversation). > > I don't have any objections to this or a better solution to this. Thanks Viresh! Beata, can we kindly move ahead with the idle optimization (which is this series), while we continue discussions for the "under load" scenarios on the other thread? BR,