From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: hugo lee <cs.hugolee@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuguo Li <hugoolli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Synchronize APIC State with QEMU when irqchip=split
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:32:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJobIRQ7Z4Ou1hz0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAdeq_+wLaze3TVY5To8_DhE_S9jocKn4+M9KvHp0Jg8pT99KQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025, hugo lee wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2025, hugo lee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2025, Yuguo Li wrote:
> > > > > When using split irqchip mode, IOAPIC is handled by QEMU while the LAPIC is
> > > > > emulated by KVM. When guest disables LINT0, KVM doesn't exit to QEMU for
> > > > > synchronization, leaving IOAPIC unaware of this change. This may cause vCPU
> > > > > to be kicked when external devices(e.g. PIT)keep sending interrupts.
> > > >
> > > > I don't entirely follow what the problem is. Is the issue that QEMU injects an
> > > > IRQ that should have been blocked? Or is QEMU forcing the vCPU to exit unnecessarily?
> > > >
> > >
> > > This issue is about QEMU keeps injecting should-be-blocked
> > > (blocked by guest and qemu just doesn't know that) IRQs.
> > > As a result, QEMU forces vCPU to exit unnecessarily.
> >
> > Is the problem that the guest receives spurious IRQs, or that QEMU is forcing
> > unnecesary exits, i.e hurting performance?
> >
>
> It is QEMU is forcing unnecessary exits which will hurt performance by
> trying to require the Big QEMU Lock in qemu_wait_io_event.
Please elaborate on the performance impact and why the issue can't be solved in
QEMU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 8:10 Yuguo Li
2025-08-06 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-07 8:03 ` hugo lee
2025-08-07 18:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-08 2:46 ` hugo lee
2025-08-11 16:32 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-08-12 9:39 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-12 10:18 ` hugo lee
2025-08-12 10:08 ` hugo lee
2025-08-12 10:46 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-12 11:50 ` hugo lee
2025-08-12 12:54 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-13 9:30 ` hugo lee
2025-08-13 10:03 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-14 8:54 ` hugo lee
2025-08-14 9:10 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJobIRQ7Z4Ou1hz0@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cs.hugolee@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugoolli@tencent.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®