From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CCBF2EAB68; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755093170; cv=none; b=QgHIHTLppQ17kxyZJzhLZbWTPzCM0hRYVJ9D+nnM5haKednXYJiQFqXbgWoGSDTD4gBUYbY/MZjRvpsRwXQ45qKohY5ESmuYoS8KRv6xlH6B8+02jEVn4sZ/RpNwmHOttdTJrI7x3f0Zk9PEkLSDshqWNNDIiysf/zW3yJMahAM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755093170; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yRzIBpcwo03V92Cu9B8zeqXJTartIC1MviVhaIBxQdM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j9YUhWaLzKBnG66U/zaEyxT6yN/eOt9KJWc4q5a6PGOAxp4rXQJFY7Gi8mHTuGpsZaqmXTqXadelceGFwUjRsoearY2pb9MZULTuAfLmRzOP7CNWpno9X5jhYV4rGeL4qvBiosWM3RBNKtE+7ZG/vk22Yiftb2wan/WKk05GHaE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZAwj9hMe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZAwj9hMe" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1755093170; x=1786629170; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=yRzIBpcwo03V92Cu9B8zeqXJTartIC1MviVhaIBxQdM=; b=ZAwj9hMeBbrlCEqTO1etqD52Ib7zYRuFfbkqzsVrMfKiNpQRlEPFCXGn 3nIOvMchcMhGBsxiAH9Kt2iX4/9H4G4RYXE434AsGeKcuAtwy3PXYGnwy 4bgJHzoYiEp+cb2DvpmEGtkiaPy+nVyQ5hoRntie97P9KMoNSj48OlRGk L4CDHVaLEm2HXbZt4KZdTbdXR3E7ncapUlFhlRmJXRWTqrQKKcGDI2iTW Y/MCDxfioY4Ut6THrPCEElSadYsntHEeh+e+DH+B8DJaIXnXKsfxVwhSp bt9MNyzoC8EusmhT6ok2Sw4zXOxoSd8fgNV58Fkl3uzYTGOvPouGm+eUI w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WxwWpv4/SxeMt2n2Nl4x+A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mwuitVOTTWymQsL1rl8Vqg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11520"; a="57289139" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,285,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="57289139" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2025 06:52:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: a6XmckWnTmOaZ0W7wn/o/A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9CE9RbIqTnCtSYCj/rZ3aA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,285,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="170928900" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2025 06:52:44 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1umBuB-00000005RqB-41aP; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:52:39 +0300 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:52:39 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dominique Martinet Cc: Nathan Chancellor , kernel test robot , Dominique Martinet via B4 Relay , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Christian Brauner , David Howells , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Maximilian Bosch , Ryan Lahfa , Christian Theune , Arnout Engelen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iov_iter: iterate_folioq: fix handling of offset >= folio size Message-ID: References: <20250811-iot_iter_folio-v1-1-d9c223adf93c@codewreck.org> <202508120250.Eooq2ydr-lkp@intel.com> <20250813051633.GA3895812@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:45:33PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Andy Shevchenko wrote on Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 03:39:09PM +0200: > > > I assume Andrew will pick it up eventually? > > > > I hope this to happen sooner as it broke my builds too (I always do now `make W=1` > > and suggest all developers should follow). > > I actually test with W=1 too, but somehow this warning doesn't show up > in my build, I'm not quite sure why :/ > (even if I try clang like the test robot... But there's plenty of > other warnings all around everywhere else, so I agree this is all way > too manual) Depends on your config, last few releases I was specifically targetting x86 defconfigs (32- and 64-bit) to be build with `make W=1`. There are a couple of changes that are still pending, but otherwise it builds with GCC and clang. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko