From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de (isilmar-4.linta.de [136.243.71.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B882F0C4A; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=136.243.71.142 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755355427; cv=none; b=RmkodBgu21DT6Oq2mzATEWs6JDu1C4+MMH+A4v+wIaYVIyAhafT34KJXkegClpsDYadpDPjknHTQfXG/lPOEB1UQEqPEjqW1S0wJxkwu0FGaWOVpv88Rik5GDl2tfTD1LTRPdHhCTAQcEHKeoDFLJFgusEBQVIn4rTUlZYrJoao= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755355427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pPS3+waBKJZuNb6253otbngG8ThZHROIxTa2swY+WYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MrwEjbQoI5eYjUHfTNUWLtHafF0B733tP+JsMi6OWYhuIrrnfH3qZ/RaPkoKqPBezQoO4WAf7MWYJwbPCc65lXOG1s+HSTIKyZBYSxR3F4e7TZjk5cPx0J3W5O1S+H9SGU1lszrPE/YBk9VY/G0rjtjKtVKhvx01DS3qloMQVko= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dominikbrodowski.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dominikbrodowski.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dominikbrodowski.net header.i=@dominikbrodowski.net header.b=bYMNAbur; arc=none smtp.client-ip=136.243.71.142 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dominikbrodowski.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dominikbrodowski.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dominikbrodowski.net header.i=@dominikbrodowski.net header.b="bYMNAbur" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dominikbrodowski.net; s=k19.isilmar-4; t=1755355416; bh=pPS3+waBKJZuNb6253otbngG8ThZHROIxTa2swY+WYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bYMNAburrhC/oT4b3swyvRvlXyf3Q7IKHqdyfxntxB9TRJC0zatFNicoHqZV4EqYT rDxFQaPBLcf9fVGcbTkHBp2oiuxyXtXBN6JHn0zYS4N+U+GG5PYP8DmsG2iBXUSwFV J+7Gqmacd5GeqtY8AZZ5hZ+1Gy3Ur8YoRpZ8HQltGHhTE27Vyr+BbbfG73LqNsq/Gt Vemc6PnToVZYnCa/B2JS0+GsVLRSMbkYYoVdheA1e5BJf4NkavGS7nGpuGTW79QtUV /n0iNyKMDq0mp7gdiWTnZntplEHyAWsjTGc2trb1bye2YEc/n+RXVnX8Es3gXVX6Fl L9NboqNLHFohA== Received: from shine.dominikbrodowski.net (shine.brodo.linta [10.2.0.112]) by isilmar-4.linta.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AF3A20074E; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by shine.dominikbrodowski.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D5D9A00A2; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:42:31 +0200 From: Dominik Brodowski To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Janitors , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Yang Yingliang , Lee Jones , Randy Dunlap , Shaomin Deng , Jilin Yuan , Mao Zhu Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: ds: Emphasize "really" epizeuxis Message-ID: References: <20250811020436.13486-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250811020436.13486-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Applied to pcmcia-next. Thanks, Dominik Am Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:04:37AM +0700 schrieb Bagas Sanjaya: > pcmcia_dev_present() comment writes about small timeframe where > the function returns NULL (racy condition), in epizeuxis device. In the > past, it tripped contributors who misunderstood it for "really" > duplicate ([1], [2]). > > Add comma between "really" words to emphasize the epizeuxis. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YxT1As38WRZcyH0%2F@shine.dominikbrodowski.net/ [1] > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220831083623.GA25639@isilmar-4.linta.de/ [2] > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya > --- > drivers/pcmcia/ds.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > index da6f66f357cc10..18f4eef28dbc5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int pcmcia_bus_early_resume(struct pcmcia_socket *skt) > * physically present, even if the call to this function returns > * non-NULL. Furthermore, the device driver most likely is unbound > * almost immediately, so the timeframe where pcmcia_dev_present > - * returns NULL is probably really really small. > + * returns NULL is probably really, really small. > */ > struct pcmcia_device *pcmcia_dev_present(struct pcmcia_device *_p_dev) > { > > base-commit: 8f5ae30d69d7543eee0d70083daf4de8fe15d585 > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara > >