From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BBC315783 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 17:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755538999; cv=none; b=J3NfqLVsP19FR8As4FX8QZ8ZF0FzGI51YHLKnubSq6dKIobvFoK0iXX3ygQqA9/kBCRvhk9cs7Th8G5eYBJWlsZvH546dqHgRSv+AanQdYU1pXPO17OhjDWWbgeMFXs9u6hLUzdoGSLFMiBRQyr4ZCzaNJ7066iiSbl/AfqzNfE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755538999; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6yGFbng6TuvlASm0gMlvUw3GVPYLN4WydFGBaRcbEGY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ti81gTl7Vakk5WF/gnd4yjZFJwsxeaBnWqrUR6Jsr9yFoRz0UTj/G8arCJtFQHAEB4JBAbjXkxVCQV71a7KxRyDeoEeWvv17z/XoJdaivRBnlY/k6rsEZia9RPyv3khl1CsvLleTALUxDBKSOT9sx1lDhkwKuk4KUEXaA15N3p4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BsqVydyW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BsqVydyW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87A0BC4CEEB; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 17:43:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755538999; bh=6yGFbng6TuvlASm0gMlvUw3GVPYLN4WydFGBaRcbEGY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BsqVydyWM+6jlf9FYWHFklNLd7YI9yd4iS3WUI5R2l6QcSTzHVoczw/vtY5ohjAFs 2D6OkDdmUoysE2G2NN70Gw+lVf10M4PUYc8hmxJnznnU+zTfudhufvJVkRLvMyBiR/ eHkp474VXD3CnEzAWb+QAZrYn3MN5zs6Qp3fkvjWaktGMv9UhbD7chB+bLKHB8WDbS O4OY0ZUSSYvCKaS84PgdJD4kqofSCHPmWEPZul8kWQR2rCWqVzg1OyAJ+GJkb3WY+f 6SXyhY/ZgMqYa9vMSd0hNk6ljSeu7kc3PkyjblnoXK1VKtGWP3mkA8jC0SWyzrkEVt LXSQhTKarjmZg== Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 07:43:18 -1000 From: 'Tejun Heo' To: liuwenfang Cc: 'David Vernet' , 'Andrea Righi' , 'Changwoo Min' , 'Ingo Molnar' , 'Peter Zijlstra' , 'Juri Lelli' , 'Vincent Guittot' , 'Dietmar Eggemann' , 'Steven Rostedt' , 'Ben Segall' , 'Mel Gorman' , 'Valentin Schneider' , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation Message-ID: References: <7ae16e02aba64a318d8e67be9e3b7f8e@honor.com> <46cef95e02d64b35a9d9d51d5debee22@honor.com> <6ccd5ef5752d4cc1818e152f6b3458b0@honor.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 10:45:55AM +0000, liuwenfang wrote: > +void scx_put_prev_set_next(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, > + struct task_struct *next) Might as well match the surrounding naming convention and use __put_prev_set_next_scx() > Any suggestions will be appreciated and a formal patch will be sent out later. Other than that, looks fine to me. Thanks. -- tejun