From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E4A21ABBB; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755592775; cv=none; b=NtQIeDQ2EfMQK4EOgODhW66BA1Jt2vBFWDc5Ti0X7RCEIcG1CeR5rp/op5ogdK6p7SF74CJZfPc2Noa2heiO91dbDoR+4VMiO7P3xAo5QzHYTodnV3lCe21QFHXXzgNDt93JquGzONaj8WIyBNqwCEAPDHYDd1NuenmY7NrU8Nw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755592775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S/iXwuz8N0uwMCfHp+T12qa3ce4k79eljimBk6WuzjQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kkggADO2tJGiAoPzMH4uSNosCU29DuqfQ0VOKmcTITiLAWPlk9SYRP1zcEhiRRrPEnhX7GSiW9P5AjYkGtLDhBq9UI0kB9Te32uLZ4pyNuG2ZEFrjBhKsoufzMBYXavANrZ9GT1jXUT/28IPTnhw8+NVQ+NeUjUW/vJHZp9hSbw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oNt8FFRJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oNt8FFRJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B700C4CEF1; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:39:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755592774; bh=S/iXwuz8N0uwMCfHp+T12qa3ce4k79eljimBk6WuzjQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oNt8FFRJnA96OKeSLKP2MFsA3PbVp2Pbq7DnODQ3ldCYJEyR8gQ1JkdMYSdH0nBUi J0fqhfqnq39Ral5NVj8NMSMgsjx/6hftzdv5/wWbB316pzpyYMFhajiZ2mivEFdWVv dWYiG2y0HmO77VM+RsG8rVciewaTX+HtnW67wEdX0i5yjvcxfcJISp9q8fTcKEH85M 1ZI6iMsEo31AWAqzvfFG8ba95as+0t+Eelh8ETSCvTQNIuVK52lZjmwD+wbBbPx7Q7 QfAVBlchlqBNcI81b9sgaFZnl4LRWsgHO5oYvvlZOOziCcZZ8q7Mk2aRbmKyFcbRT4 rb2XVczqFiKhg== Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:39:29 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Arnd Bergmann , soc@lists.linux.dev, Catalin Marinas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: exclude defconfig from ARM64 PORT Message-ID: References: <20250818-arm64-defconfig-v1-1-f589553c3d72@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250818-arm64-defconfig-v1-1-f589553c3d72@collabora.com> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:08:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Patches for the arm64 defconfig are supposed to be sent to the > SoC maintainers (e.g. a change in the generic arm64 defconfig > required for Rockchip devices should be send to Heiko Stübner > as he is listed as maintainer for "ARM/Rockchip SoC support") > and not the ARM64 PORT maintainers. > > While we cannot easily describe this in MAINTAINERS, we can at > least stop it from giving false information and make it behave > the same way as for the MAINTAINERS file itself (which basically > has the same rules), so that it just outputs the LKML for the > ARM64 defconfig. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index daf520a13bdf6a991c0160a96620f40308c29ee0..b6466a628381bf40ebcf7e3638ec65fabf6ad357 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3667,6 +3667,7 @@ F: drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/ > F: drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/ > F: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/ > X: arch/arm64/boot/dts/ > +X: arch/arm64/configs/defconfig Acked-by: Will Deacon Will