From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9A92DCBE2 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755732155; cv=none; b=TEVU7Gn3/LzABIa+shmP+UBvhlZUPBoXdtYuZaPmFYW9IeP8CLiVEvkbMNXJrNgxHD2EP2auWzTVgHfWP/ph6KmHK9eAsTe67NlJpycLt4h+OU/bmzav4lNbv62TyM2zy9NsUGrVyAwBLGKxENTenC82ExdnZSP45pML7vK4//s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755732155; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PpLNXafYyYaJHl4yNf0bRH9rCTDQ/HwRXwL7LoAmxYo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QLTqyNJmI4QEpoSMInwOwqQYLABw5oTXLaALXkOeBLEp7mE80ipwi7AlNd/obzxnA7CeNY/lknUYY0HI9p4nw/tTq1FCmbcp4gjRlKUZivqoqfD78AuST8w4nYoDDWmLVFxNZr5H1icqgFnDu8TWdSFWHI/LGup4uKX+9DLMYxs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pBwROZD+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pBwROZD+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05882C4CEE7; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:22:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755732155; bh=PpLNXafYyYaJHl4yNf0bRH9rCTDQ/HwRXwL7LoAmxYo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pBwROZD+jz6oojHUSaEUyyH7wBDl8HnMPq+RJ9egX8eT/r4Q1DNyp+N/XIvBkgTZQ +i+kNkn/zf1+V5hxkQefxGojUziIFgarsYl8d3+bZy+ZMl+dP5lzh1kMF2m8WqKzBW WvWX3uJUBBXNW4XR6viAkeZi38E0SMeloqkntQNNHgCEwRskSTVk3y4l68oKNHWmEO WNz2MqOfeUbiEecLbLHVPVo4k6CfO7fV/rzzr2fxziDlLyZpa6BEkUkhDGI5FCOR45 4zEPxUYOvDdAJNIKPhZCDPeGkEHmQvnAxnEoSIi8ljqKtS7A3ppN1l8Ye0YU0Eitgh Aod5KAOZGF2fQ== Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:22:34 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Marco Crivellari Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Workqueue: replace system wq and change alloc_workqueue callers Message-ID: References: <20250815094510.52360-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:41:01AM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote: > I'm not sure I have clearly understood what you mean here: > > > e.g. Network flows through the same tree but different > > filesystems often have their own trees. > > With this, you mean also distinguish between e.g. fs/ext4/ fs/etx2/ > and fs/btrfs/ etc? > So if it is the case, in the example above, it means 3 different series. > Prefixed like this, I imagine: "workqueue: btrfs: ....". NVM, if Christian can apply for all filesystems, that's better. > And I guess it would be the same for drivers, eg drivers/net/ I think net should be fine with wider scope patches, actually. It's mostly about laying things out for respective subsys maintainers so that it's easier for them to take actions. Thanks. -- tejun