mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, razor@blackwall.org,
	idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	yuehaibing@huawei.com, zhangchangzhong@huawei.com,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: br_netfilter: reread nf_conn from skb after confirm()
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:57:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKbDZWHNf4_Nktsm@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80706fff-ca22-45f5-ac0b-ff84e1ba6a8b@huawei.com>

Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/8/20 19:31, Florian Westphal 写道:
> > Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > Previous commit 2d72afb34065 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to
> > > removal of uninitialised entry") move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after
> > > the hash table insertion.
> > How is that related to this change?
> > As you write below, the bug came in with 62e7151ae3eb.
> 
> Before the commit 2d72afb34065, __nf_conntrack_confirm() set
> 'ct->status |= IPS_CONFIRMED;' before check hash, the warning will not
> happen, so I put it here.

Oh, right, the problem was concealed before this.

> > There is a second bug here, confirm can return NF_DROP and
> > nfct will be NULL.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion!
> 
> Do you mean that ct may be deleted in confirm and return NF_DROP, so we can
> not visit it in br_nf_local_in() and need to add 'case NF_DROP:' here?
>
> I cannot find somewhere set skb->_nfct to NULL and return NF_DROP. Can you
> give some hints?

You are right, skb->_nfct isn't set to NULL in case NF_DROP is returned.
However, the warning will trigger as we did not insert the conntrack
entry in that case.

I suggest to remove the warning, I don't think it buys anything.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-20  4:33 Wang Liang
2025-08-20 11:31 ` Florian Westphal
2025-08-21  1:56   ` Wang Liang
2025-08-21  6:57     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-08-22  1:08       ` Wang Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKbDZWHNf4_Nktsm@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®