From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: phy: Clear link-specific data on link down
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKg7nf8YczCT6N0O@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKg4XcM0vAIS4C-8@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:29:01AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:19:24AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > When a network interface is brought down, the associated PHY is stopped.
> > > However, several link-specific parameters within the phy_device struct
> > > are not cleared. This leads to userspace tools like ethtool reporting
> > > stale information from the last active connection, which is misleading
> > > as the link is no longer active.
> >
> > This is not a good idea. Consider the case where the PHY has been
> > configured with autoneg disabled, and phydev->speed etc specifies
> > the desired speed.
> >
> > When the link goes down, all that state gets cleared, and we lose
> > the user's settings.
> >
> > So no, I don't think this is appropriate.
> >
> > I think it is appropriate to clear some of the state, but anything that
> > the user can configure (such as ->speed and ->duplex) must not be
> > cleared.
>
> Hm... should it be cleared conditionally? If autoneg is used, clear the
> speed and duplex?
Actually no, you can't do any of this here.
Look at phy_ethtool_set_eee_noneg(). If the LPI configuration changes,
it needs to inform the MAC of the change, and it does that by
_simulating_ a brief loss of link by calling phy_link_down() followed
by phy_link_up() - expecting all state to be preserved except that
which needs to be modified.
Maybe we should do something in the PHY_HALTED state in
_phy_state_machine() ?
Note that in the usual case of link down, it is the responsibility of
phy_read_status() to update most of what you're clearing, the
exception is phydev->eee_active and phydev->enable_tx_lpi which are
managed by phylib itself.
I think that both the PHY_HALTED and PHY_ERROR states should be
clearing phydev->eee_active and phydev->enable_tx_lpi, so that
should be in the existing if().
I'm not sure we want to clear out the remainder of the state on
PHY_ERROR, as this would aid debugging when something goes wrong.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 9:09 Oleksij Rempel
2025-08-22 9:19 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-08-22 9:29 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-08-22 9:42 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKg7nf8YczCT6N0O@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®