From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver.sang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: fprobe: fix suspicious rcu usage in fprobe_entry
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 17:17:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLa2D4It1Zxc7bs0@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829021436.19982-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index fb127fa95f21..fece0f849c1c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,9 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fregs))
> return 0;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> head = rhltable_lookup(&fprobe_ip_table, &func, fprobe_rht_params);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> reserved_words = 0;
> rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
> if (node->addr != func)
Actually this isn't quite right. I know that it is a false-positive
so that it's actually safe, but if you're going to mark it with
rcu_read_lock, it should cover both the lookup as well as the
dereference which happens in the loop rhl_for_each_entry_rcu.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 2:14 Menglong Dong
2025-08-29 2:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-29 2:49 ` menglong.dong
2025-08-29 11:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-29 11:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-01 8:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-01 15:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-02 6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-02 11:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-03 9:43 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-04 9:44 ` [PATCH] rhashtable: Use rcu_dereference_all and rcu_dereference_all_check Herbert Xu
2025-09-08 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-09 9:50 ` [v2 PATCH] " Herbert Xu
2025-09-25 10:17 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-01 10:06 ` [PATCH] tracing: fprobe: fix suspicious rcu usage in fprobe_entry Herbert Xu
2025-09-01 8:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-02 9:17 ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2025-09-02 9:50 ` menglong.dong
2025-09-03 4:22 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-04 3:37 ` Menglong Dong
2025-09-04 4:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-04 5:42 ` Menglong Dong
2025-09-04 9:08 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-02 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-03 4:23 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-04 5:41 ` menglong.dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLa2D4It1Zxc7bs0@gondor.apana.org.au \
--to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®