From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, changwoo@igalia.com, hodgesd@meta.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, jake@hillion.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:58:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLbb9ljZvAvghZa8@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902111143.2667154-1-christian.loehle@arm.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 12:11:40PM +0100, Christian Loehle wrote:
> scx_bpf_cpu_rq() currently allows accessing struct rq fields without
> holding the associated rq.
> It is being used by scx_cosmos, scx_flash, scx_lavd, scx_layered, and
> scx_tickless. Fortunately it is only ever used to fetch rq->curr.
> So provide an alternative scx_bpf_remote_curr() that doesn't expose struct rq
> and provide a hardened scx_bpf_cpu_rq_locked() by ensuring we hold the rq lock.
> Add a deprecation warning to scx_bpf_cpu_rq() that mentions the two alternatives.
>
> This also simplifies scx code from:
>
> rq = scx_bpf_cpu_rq(cpu);
> if (!rq)
> return;
> p = rq->curr
> /* ... Do something with p */
>
> into:
>
> p = scx_bpf_remote_curr(cpu);
> /* ... Do something with p */
This looks good to me.
We should probably add a __COMPAT_scx_bpf_remote_curr() macro, so that the
BPF schedulers can be updated to use this new kfunc without breaking the
compatibility with older kernels, but we can do this later, I'll send a
follow-up patch. For now:
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 11:11 Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_cpu_rq_locked() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_remote_curr() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] sched_ext: deprecation warn for scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:58 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-09-02 13:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 14:10 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLbb9ljZvAvghZa8@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=hodgesd@meta.com \
--cc=jake@hillion.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®