From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5CB221F0C for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 06:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757572789; cv=none; b=QrFZ68v/orjbJYZUtIbmTkS0xDXxyo4+JnFyo3cf5Mc6bxMzkfLDHGrVxw3b1TvGxP/5gP6yJOiO/QtHqfpha5c00qxAn9ycRmSBbnOyIa6RW2oXHO5rp8TbvQMnwz4vWI6GcIydzZ9UNBx9GEyJxUHtrVV8dk2KoSGfVLoIPCo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757572789; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L8o32onMABOVp8/pkTZQw6vQLL93zFnmSTrzqXO3azc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qLZGfBvJx5BPw1fmJWaK3tjAPtzgVWkZhJpZpkoP7u6Uu+2hwJRopL6GlEr9emzgwFrxsgXyzfTxPMXakNa61QNwd87y3GnpYVqmmzLrqPgrPjiy++QYlb4cMdWcqdWpj+7VBDu81FYiJa1quPlY05n+/QcyLwcHzQ45Ujwx840= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lr0JzyW3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lr0JzyW3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757572788; x=1789108788; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=L8o32onMABOVp8/pkTZQw6vQLL93zFnmSTrzqXO3azc=; b=lr0JzyW3AXxX1rOVoEeeR6ojPQkqwEWxzOn0JgF5dpjpzhR9u587zs0r +Tj9rFLrI1jQfllg2HdQlpphyvrE17ZjKkW7y4YEUIqqH0Pg3LZRVwru8 31K9N6ASC+bttwKCzItkRT8l38C0YeoXANwv8HMvH2yUN4PmA1iS5ra0D 5Mr7xUGqa3X3nByQtxRxqxAjgfgL9qaaRPv3Nmx+uuovkzb0kzVIDQ8Op X++R1kgSrMrCk8WPEWkzFggu3CXlyx8WeaY0Z1lnfIqdEzufqhSgMZGB2 f0XM6vQRX2TVg/zWle6P6gjGBO6D17hzlrwptKT8/FkwdrhGNflBFIdRZ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CMiGJplBSOymxXQBYcerOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4qeITTBLQBKPUlS6b4c+LQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11531"; a="59842024" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,312,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="59842024" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2025 23:39:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vcqDcBWNTtmy4rKFSLeppA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: coSGbHPFTsKZMe9zH+yFNA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,256,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="173182969" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.245.180]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2025 23:39:45 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8423C11F83D; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:39:42 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:39:42 +0300 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Martin Hecht Cc: michael.roeder@avnet.eu, martin.hecht@avnet.eu, Tommaso Merciai , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Ribalda Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: i2c: alvium: Accelerated alvium_set_power Message-ID: References: <20250909112252.2577949-1-mhecht73@gmail.com> <7f095cde-cefc-4259-9f7d-9de17c12758b@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f095cde-cefc-4259-9f7d-9de17c12758b@gmail.com> Hi Martin, On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 07:17:01PM +0200, Martin Hecht wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > thank you for your feedback. Please ignore v3 because overlap. I will adopt > your proposal and send v4. Nevertheless I'm in conversation with Ricardo > because some eventually misleading feedback from CI to learn how to deal > with that. Ack. > > return ret ?: brcm_major ? 0 : -ENODEV; Actually -ETIMEDOUT is probably a better choice than -ENODEV in this case. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus