From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16DB310645; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758559089; cv=none; b=Dav+X5KEMw9YFxZs3RV/6Ry28JElsrE+TwJTwZ3a7rh4ht3x4siRcrBvVhqvq7U6mVpA+zx+Wuc3OxKORXbDsCD8cfWiU1VCY1VXbNQ8YxYB73jgsBRaqmpV0DaRsRAsX2ISGQGUb6M/p9R6I1ZgMogDkX5o4sp5sKNVqEMdHSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758559089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Os+e4tQ1+o8C90kF/WbtmVLlttUFgf0PteI7dtYBh20=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iKZVbtcaSoETpKKVLAQ1kxQ5YrRPg8fdV2FH+YJcMCRo7WNRIBjklv1AD7l5046/pmto428KTIOE52Pjo7QC+87mYCfZ5pCGdNtZDEBLLxZV8K0gjGSyloADBXjmINPxkb45r969E2UmKbgMlzB7ssXg6r7HOoT0OCACES2Sjwo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Q1EFcUXy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Q1EFcUXy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAF5FC4CEF0; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:38:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758559089; bh=Os+e4tQ1+o8C90kF/WbtmVLlttUFgf0PteI7dtYBh20=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q1EFcUXyzWTZtQEIVWoYWdJRsfny2qvJT5HuA6VZmbJJduatGWsy/haCrs6DohoXr v7stJPrBmp+ntK4R378D/RutfZtrt6NVYLGEKj02+fwnNbBQzQyUJMAqofKHNNB+KV hnLG3/sXf19KZsDqTsW6wC76YZrg04XmOtyOfFfMAys2QhOdOKkgcR2fZmnR1WySE/ P7DKbaaUTreem4Tnev+sTpCmjB0wXEztKb3GmwzNvGIClBPhynfIucEL3+Uf8/bwUB ZErmp4pVtDhyg5IR6vW0zY9bjvQT6ipU0safmUiF9+1+i4QDNwth6iVRBzAx7yOz8D 0GHFXrat/BvHw== Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:38:04 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Giuliano Procida Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] system certificates: specify byte alignment Message-ID: References: <20250912100015.1267643-1-gprocida@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250912100015.1267643-1-gprocida@google.com> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Giuliano Procida wrote: > The .align macro is architecture dependent. On arm64 it behaves as > .p2align. The various alignments in this file are all bytes. > > So use the .balign macro to avoid unnecessary padding due to > over-alignment. > > Signed-off-by: Giuliano Procida > --- > certs/system_certificates.S | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Does certs/revocation_certificates.S need fixing as well? Will