From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Reuven Abliyev <reuven.abliyev@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: intel-dg: wake card on operations
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:50:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPedq3pz2TXYUSEk@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021123246.3629282-1-alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 03:32:46PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> The Intel DG cards do not have separate power control for
> persistent memory.
> The memory is available when the whole card is awake.
>
> Enable runtime PM in mtd driver to notify parent graphics driver
> that whole card should be kept awake while nvm operations are
> performed through this driver.
> CC: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
It's possible to make less noise in the commit message by moving Cc:s to...
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
> ---
...here. It will have the same effect on email, but commit message will be
cleaner.
> V2: Address review comments (Andrey S)
I think you meant Andy or Andriy here :-)
...
> + devm_pm_runtime_enable(device);
I consider this as a wrong pattern of devm_*() usage. If one uses devm_*() they
should check for errors and act accordingly. (One way can be a printed warning,
but again, the devm_*() call inside can be implemented differently. It might
make device be enabled for a moment and fail due to upper layer issues, such as
memory allocation. In such case the error is different because it comes from
a different layer and you effectively ignore it without a reason. Hence either
check for errors, or drop devm_*() here.)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 12:32 Alexander Usyskin
2025-10-21 14:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-10-22 10:07 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-10-22 14:26 ` Usyskin, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPedq3pz2TXYUSEk@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=reuven.abliyev@intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®