From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496053F9D2 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761097870; cv=none; b=RNR9qq1Y06EFSftUht2/LwtdwZt4mxenQvq+QnzInEYxFlteN7ij+l77nu+Na2UGD4gKYlUrOQK6P4zaVGky6Gy7TnrN2c8+6qQZrud1qCXRpIZXknvNdTcHxK3ZhawZ4Mki6gNfMCZIavz4GV1AzitsFP3LPT1X9gpNR4k2lnM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761097870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M6c8HbksTy9YaQrooyjRe4bq+q1w4ySMC3x/H0yPBFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vf0F20cz1ZyoUNvk9BCjixWaRqAKPMtcRma3IkmWyCYBD5RzPiYiGK5lEs6CgHc1aqdlB/AxVGVvYJleuy5C7xxxw1b5H68ghHxjK/pxrxAcoFWCAVASa7BQOx8Faz8kkLq+ShI9fQX3/hDARV73c0++v+RCnK9dzF4NM03tMjk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YUChTIFK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YUChTIFK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4EC1C4CEF1; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:51:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761097869; bh=M6c8HbksTy9YaQrooyjRe4bq+q1w4ySMC3x/H0yPBFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YUChTIFK+sL3dyNfeemA8WRYJ74gjM8V4MWxPhiGYGZPxYH9PSu8WebtjCC6Hp8Us XNRqEM474sk5siDtcmM3tidhfix3D/2vovlZ8wnFekJt+FZMnvVa/k9zeTspxuFlgA 7tIZnL0WGPktlhF94bGJxHyR0UOY0TQWIE5PXmv2e0i+oe8+1zu3vcB8DHfGpTw/WZ HGwhurx6ht5ZlqSxudLqL0zIiJT3REm3DwWE+kHffFf+S9Hje6DXnTpdnsrc/CJRQ8 PJnNx9LoCb9sSlae60SFwyOlGZtVW6WDbgOOsSNXzfW5hZg+6lBCxmirVcGG4d9t9p SL0MnpWNH/gAQ== Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:51:08 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Matthew Brost Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, christian.koenig@amd.com, pstanner@redhat.com, dakr@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Add an interface to taint workqueue lockdep with reclaim Message-ID: References: <20251021213952.746900-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> <20251021213952.746900-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 06:22:19PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > please update the patch so that WQ_MEM_RECLAIM implicitly enables the > > checking? > > Sure, but a bunch of things immediately break—including a convoluted > case in my driver. I can fix the kernel to the extent that my CI catches > issues, and fix any obvious cases through manual inspection. However, > I suspect that if we merge this, we'll be dealing with fallout > throughout a kernel RC cycle. Sure, we're still early in this cycle and can try to resolve as much as possible and if there's just too much, we can make it optional and so on. Thanks. -- tejun