From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BBB320B7E1; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761123288; cv=none; b=CJvkMwmjOT/wLk7aJ0agqSzQvY9K/Ynl47lE5OcObrhuIIwfQ+kH9NJ+NeBk+Iyhi2Lx1eg5x+THw/rRf29ehRXStmE2VWZj+5OhgJ8BEYQLMCElqLArNcG5uo2SNS/lMgY+Pgjd41M4obGDGKtO+lOV+hGk1VYR4tS9wZ6udwY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761123288; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R3jzD6CzBSxf1gumv5ZW163Wkyn/4GrrIV6HRnjDdNU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ExydYOmlcroZi6h4E6dgrckP/FCGXL/tf/Su2MLqi+G9SY6JXzQuEilZ50VKiMLHveBnkkojZSCjWajppzqed8rSv617DdfSQpWLqcX3WXX76ujmpUA+j6TRvHE/bVfLFsU9lgzWaYZ/sItBgiNZ5ASAHGXWOltR6Cst3J4jCvc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=qLcz8g00; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="qLcz8g00" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ekrlHcjYC4m+Xa92FKOsdA1s49hcSWsjk1pkcgl5E+k=; b=qLcz8g00L1gzbpYWiRi/cu4S1p usSj8RVOMmWMZgf4y2wbCSdJhgMsMX1N73GTCjukUVhY6b6sJmzuCtQ1q+PdvNK2j3jJ6gkdxrXUD 4PHLPPkxikg13WgqYYIy2yii8vwE3DtXYc4GizGh4pptGBzuuvGcRzWz5L7vzyBJ7fmkLphcp5BbH xSkrzJDZOfLNWaEG0/5MoKNxcgKLDjb1T2lO9Stgd1pGTOTVWKWWdvpLFwblsY4hSIqhZzbD9aJyk dReYdVT2/Rwq3bgM4jL0y6MXDSts9kssqRURqwMz67+sQuXFCprDicW1aGK+k9N6jTXdsc1bSXx/Q kK4o/EYg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vBUcE-000000029rJ-20Q7; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:54:42 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:54:42 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Winiarski Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alex Williamson , Lucas De Marchi , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Rodrigo Vivi , Jason Gunthorpe , Yishai Hadas , Kevin Tian , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Brost , Michal Wajdeczko , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Lukasz Laguna Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/26] vfio/xe: Add vendor-specific vfio_pci driver for Intel graphics Message-ID: References: <20251021224133.577765-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com> <20251021224133.577765-27-michal.winiarski@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:12:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > There is absolutely nothing vendor-specific here, it is a device variant > > driver. In fact in Linux basically nothing is ever vendor specific, > > because vendor is not a concept that does matter in any practical sense > > except for tiny details like the vendor ID as one of the IDs to match > > on in device probing. > > > > I have no idea why people keep trying to inject this term again and > > again. > > Hi, > > The reasoning was that in this case we're matching vendor ID + class > combination to match all Intel GPUs, and not just selected device ID, > but I get your point. Which sounds like a really bad idea. Is this going to work on i810 devices? Or the odd parts povervr based parts?