On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Biancaa Ramesh wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Biancaa Ramesh <biancaa2210329@ssn.edu.in>

As others have pointed out in all your previous patches: make sure to describe
your changes (in imperative mood) along with appropriate one-line patch title;
and most importantly: don't add any confidentality disclaimers.

> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 795ee393eac0..1760fa39a3af 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2934,7 +2934,7 @@ typedef enum {
>  	 * NOTE: This is mostly identical to MAP_CHG_NEEDED, except
>  	 * that currently vma_needs_reservation() has an unwanted side
>  	 * effect to either use end() or commit() to complete the
> -	 * transaction.	 Hence it needs to differenciate from NEEDED.
> +	 * transaction.	 Hence it needs to differentiate from NEEDED.
>  	 */
>  	MAP_CHG_ENFORCED = 2,
>  } map_chg_state;
> @@ -5983,7 +5983,7 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			int rc = vma_needs_reservation(h, vma, address);
>  
>  			if (rc < 0)
> -				/* Pressumably allocate_file_region_entries failed
> +				/* Presumably allocate_file_region_entries failed
>  				 * to allocate a file_region struct. Clear
>  				 * hugetlb_restore_reserve so that global reserve
>  				 * count will not be incremented by free_huge_folio.
> @@ -6007,7 +6007,7 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	/*
>  	 * If we unshared PMDs, the TLB flush was not recorded in mmu_gather. We
>  	 * could defer the flush until now, since by holding i_mmap_rwsem we
> -	 * guaranteed that the last refernece would not be dropped. But we must
> +	 * guaranteed that the last reference would not be dropped. But we must
>  	 * do the flushing before we return, as otherwise i_mmap_rwsem will be
>  	 * dropped and the last reference to the shared PMDs page might be
>  	 * dropped as well.
> @@ -6211,7 +6211,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	 * In order to determine where this is a COW on a MAP_PRIVATE mapping it
>  	 * is enough to check whether the old_folio is anonymous. This means that
>  	 * the reserve for this address was consumed. If reserves were used, a
> -	 * partial faulted mapping at the fime of fork() could consume its reserves
> +	 * partial faulted mapping at the time of fork() could consume its reserves
>  	 * on COW instead of the full address range.
>  	 */
>  	if (is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER) &&
> @@ -7193,7 +7193,7 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		} else if (unlikely(is_pte_marker(pte))) {
>  			/*
>  			 * Do nothing on a poison marker; page is
> -			 * corrupted, permissons do not apply.  Here
> +			 * corrupted, permissions do not apply.  Here
>  			 * pte_marker_uffd_wp()==true implies !poison
>  			 * because they're mutual exclusive.
>  			 */

The wording itself LGTM, though.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara