mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>, <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>,
	<lkp@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] [sched/fair] 79104becf4: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:16:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ3G44fqJG378pM1@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQs9yFQloF9aFCbA@rli9-mobl>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:06:32PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 12:00:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:30:08AM +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > > On 10/27/2025 10:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 03:07:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 02:55:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > May I know if you are using the kernel config 0day attached?
> > > > > > > I found that the config 0day attached
> > > > > > > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251021/202510211205.1e0f5223-lkp@intel.com/config-6.18.0-rc1-00001-g79104becf42b)
> > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION_DEFAULT_DISABLED=y
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yep, deleting that entry makes it all work.
> > > > 
> > > > 'work' might be over stating, it boots and starts trinity, which then
> > > > promptly (as in a handful of seconds) triggers OOM and dies. Not
> > > > actually reproducing the NULL deref I was looking for.
> > > 
> > > Change the following line in job-script
> > > export memory='16G'
> > > to
> > > export memory='64G'
> > > ?
> > 
> > Yes, that seems to help.
> > 
> > > I had a try and can reproduce the NULL except at first run:
> > 
> > Took me two runs, but yes, I can see it now.
> > 
> > Anyway, this is two bugs in the robot, can we please fix all this to not
> > happen again?
> 
> Got it, I will dig into the detail to understand the difference of local
> reproduce and internal cluster run. The image, kconfig, and memory
> are exactly the same for actual robot run and provided reproduce instruction,
> since the attachment is reproduced from the job execution. I didn't find the
> cause quickly, and i will be back to this asap and provide update.
> 
> > 
> >  - .config has 32bit disabled while robot provides 32bit images. Clearly
> >    the actual robot runs 64bit images and the reproduction should
> >    provide those too.

Some update that this one is resolved, the cluster run has set ia32_emulation=on
in kernel cmdline, which is missed to set in the reproduce step.

> > 
> >  - job description is inaccurate in the amount of memory required.

Got it, the cluster run with 16G has 40% rate (in about 20 runs), now i
have increased the memory to 32G so it will reduce the OOM chance in local
reproduction.

> > 
> > The reproduction steps must exactly match what the real robot runs, not
> > something else.

Sorry for wrong reproduce steps, we should be more careful to make it consistent.

And thanks again to Peter and Yu.

> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-21  5:14 kernel test robot
2025-10-21  6:39 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-21 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 12:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 13:14     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 13:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 14:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 14:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-28  2:30             ` Chen, Yu C
2025-11-05 11:00               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-05 12:06                 ` Philip Li
2025-11-07 10:16                   ` Philip Li [this message]
2025-11-07 10:53                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-04 21:04 ` Fernand Sieber
2025-11-05  8:43   ` Fernand Sieber
2025-11-05 11:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-05 12:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-06 10:54     ` Fernand Sieber
2025-11-06 23:57       ` John Stultz
2025-11-07  8:18         ` Fernand Sieber
2025-11-06 10:40 [PATCH] sched: Proxy yields to donor tasks Fernand Sieber
2025-11-06 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07  6:54 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-07  8:12   ` Fernand Sieber
2025-11-07  8:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-11 11:37 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/proxy: Yield the donor task tip-bot2 for Fernand Sieber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQ3G44fqJG378pM1@rli9-mobl \
    --to=philip.li@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®