From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] tools headers x86: Sync table due to introducion of uprobe syscall
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 13:12:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQYxWEtq-UE0ALFU@x1> (raw)
tldr; Just FYI, I'm carrying this on the perf tools tree.
Full explanation:
There used to be no copies, with tools/ code using kernel headers
directly. From time to time tools/perf/ broke due to legitimate kernel
hacking. At some point Linus complained about such direct usage. Then we
adopted the current model.
See further details at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/include/uapi/README
To pick the changes in this cset:
56101b69c9190667 ("uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to speed up uprobe")
That add support for this new 'uprobe' syscall in tools such as 'perf trace'.
Now it is possible to do a system wide 'perf trace' to look if this new
syscall is being used:
root@number:~# perf trace -v -e uprobe
<SNIP>
event qualifier tracepoint filter: (common_pid != 33989) && (id == 336)
^C
root@number#
$ grep -w uprobe tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
336 common uprobe sys_uprobe
$
This addresses these perf build warnings:
Warning: Kernel ABI header differences:
diff -u tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
Please see tools/include/uapi/README for further details.
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
index 92cf0fe2291eb99b..ced2a1deecd7ce08 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
@@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
333 common io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents
334 common rseq sys_rseq
335 common uretprobe sys_uretprobe
+336 common uprobe sys_uprobe
# don't use numbers 387 through 423, add new calls after the last
# 'common' entry
424 common pidfd_send_signal sys_pidfd_send_signal
--
2.51.0
reply other threads:[~2025-11-01 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQYxWEtq-UE0ALFU@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®