Re: [PATCH] dm-bufio: align write boundary on bdev_logical_block_size

[Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2025, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 02:48:13PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > 
> > > > When performing a read-modify-write(RMW) operation, any modification
> > > > to a buffered block must cause the entire buffer to be marked dirty.
> > > > 
> > > > Marking only a subrange as dirty is incorrect because the underlying
> > > > device block size(ubs) defines the minimum read/write granularity. A
> > > > lower device can perform I/O only on regions which are fully aligned
> > > > and sized to ubs.
> > > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > I think it would be better to fix this in dm-bufio, so that other dm-bufio 
> > > users would also benefit from the fix.
> > 
> > This looks to me like it should accomplish the same thing as
> > Uladzislau's patch. But I think there could still be problems with other
> > dm-bufio users, for devices where the blocksize is larger than 4k.
> > 
> > In dm_bufio_client_create() I think we want to make sure that block_size
> > is a multiple of bdev_logical_block_size(bdev), instead of 512b.
> 
> I could add WARN_ON(block_size < bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) to 
> dm_bufio_client_create. But I think it's too late in this development 
> cycle, I would add it after the next merge window closes, when I open a 
> new patch series for the kernel 6.20 (or 7.0).
> 
> > Otherwise block_to_sector() can return sectors that are not addressable
> > on the device. Unfortunatley, I don't think all users of dm-bufio will
> > pass in block_sizes that are larger than 4k (uds_make_bufio() in
> > dm-vdp/indexer/io-factory.c for instance).
> > 
> > -Ben
> > 
> > > Please try this patch - does it fix it?
> > > 
> > > Mikulas
> 
> I changed the patch below, so that it aligns write bios on 
> max3(DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN, bdev_logical_block_size(b->c->bdev), 
> bdev_physical_block_size(b->c->bdev)); - so that if physical block size is 
> greater than logical block size, the writes are aligned so that the device 
> doesn't do read-modify-write.

This will really only help if the bufio client block_size is a multiple
of the underlying device's physical block size, and the device is
aligned to the physical block size. Perhaps we should figure
out the alignment in dm_bufio_client_create(), with something like:

	c->align = max(DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN, bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
	if (block_size & -bdev_physical_block_size(bdev) &&
	    bdev_alignment_offset(bdev) == 0)
		c->align = bdev_physical_block_size(bdev);

I suppose pre-calculating this could cause problems if the underlying
device was another dm device, and it switched tables in a way that
changed its limits. I dunno if we care about that, however.

-Ben 

> Mikulas
> 
> > > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > There may be devices with logical block size larger than 4k. Fix
> > > dm-bufio, so that it will align I/O on logical block size. This commit
> > > fixes I/O errors on the dm-ebs target on the top of emulated nvme device
> > > with 8k logical block size created with qemu parameters:
> > > 
> > > -device nvme,drive=drv0,serial=foo,logical_block_size=8192,physical_block_size=8192
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/md/dm-bufio.c |    9 +++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c	2025-10-13 21:42:47.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c	2025-10-20 14:40:32.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static void submit_io(struct dm_buffer *
> > >  {
> > >  	unsigned int n_sectors;
> > >  	sector_t sector;
> > > -	unsigned int offset, end;
> > > +	unsigned int offset, end, align;
> > >  
> > >  	b->end_io = end_io;
> > >  
> > > @@ -1388,9 +1388,10 @@ static void submit_io(struct dm_buffer *
> > >  			b->c->write_callback(b);
> > >  		offset = b->write_start;
> > >  		end = b->write_end;
> > > -		offset &= -DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN;
> > > -		end += DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN - 1;
> > > -		end &= -DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN;
> > > +		align = max(DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN, bdev_logical_block_size(b->c->bdev));
> > > +		offset &= -align;
> > > +		end += align - 1;
> > > +		end &= -align;
> > >  		if (unlikely(end > b->c->block_size))
> > >  			end = b->c->block_size;
> > >  
> > > 
> >