From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mslow3.mail.gandi.net (mslow3.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B0279C8 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2025 14:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.178.249 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765032568; cv=none; b=VG9TIL8h1nkjcBPZRACAl/cY3/iWCFP5Rn0V2aQ/dwfT7+cQOK9b83lNeVjhykf4r+u1PTyn2BxbsSpFIt1vzEbtqunXqxZD59UNCDpRNBKltIr6Ewww/1s486xb1YSW+TF/G3gTHvCqZtKV6hcp50//Cpu9+rrN8+HgFzlh/gs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765032568; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NkjZyJNs9wpAMrcbs4u78XLH89pbMyHFAAOxoGOBVC4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Lpm9nSir3SdstvPh/B6XsToYTxbyv1Lf3YM7tqhpuQmCFHw39aZKReWUDIbm/OYen/RJmjgc5MJbORaAIAnkoD5Ziy/QlM76c3AV/sm3JY+hvjZvyZuxvINSR4mWggEBHoTmGsm10fkWXxnFmnN4el0QT8SegGfUZ7taRbje9Os= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=yoseli.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yoseli.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yoseli.org header.i=@yoseli.org header.b=HqPyZEBC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.178.249 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=yoseli.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yoseli.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yoseli.org header.i=@yoseli.org header.b="HqPyZEBC" Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) by mslow3.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6599F589B2C for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C00F43292; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yoseli.org; s=gm1; t=1764842277; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=j0JfA9qeZWT32I3zxoCJgKu5UVGNhTPQk772t2ZnUNU=; b=HqPyZEBCaEqU1FPt2tgP0xr8uAEEqIjeBw0Z+4e0HaDQNLEDshPQ52wukmcG02Pb84m/pV HzMIwb4KyLcjoxpoLE/wMW3EXJfLZMU+GM+nBv80L18pRK+GQy+xfK7PecOhraWmrSBu3+ DV46x5XkQAF8aqQiqHWejsUkTk3DXvi2+/KpBaEXd3+XGYcXax2a1cF1WXHePMDIGn+H2S K3R/0FAToR8g+maMq7IdM6Qn2HoJMFpIerCDcTL0tbjLNG/hgjnxj6jiTqgeYBXvF7fHHT hl8sa4kuFxWPwiKb9m00czh6MHJq/4reUiBg1y9yNN7vB8HnjIumShsv88OTdA== Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:57:55 +0100 From: Jean-Michel Hautbois To: Daniel Palmer Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , kernel test robot , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kas@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: implement runtime consts Message-ID: References: <20251127000505.2117956-1-daniel@thingy.jp> <202511270956.hzGiPzdZ-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdehvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpeflvggrnhdqofhitghhvghlucfjrghuthgsohhishcuoehjvggrnhhmihgthhgvlhdrhhgruhhtsghoihhsseihohhsvghlihdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephefggefgtdduheelkeeuleejjeeijeeihfetieevueeftdeigeeuueefudevjeefnecukfhppedvrgdtudemvgdtrgemudeileemjedugedtmehflehfheemfegrrgegmeeljeeljeemfeehvgeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvdgrtddumegvtdgrmeduieelmeejudegtdemfhelfhehmeefrggrgeemleejleejmeefhegvkedphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhgvrghnmhhitghhvghlrdhhrghuthgsohhisheshihoshgvlhhirdhorhhgpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedutddprhgtphhtthhopegurghnihgvlhesthhhihhnghihrdhjphdprhgtphhtthhopehgvggvrhhtsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlkhhpsehinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepohgvqdhksghui hhlugdqrghllheslhhishhtshdrlhhinhhugidruggvvhdprhgtphhtthhopehkrghssehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhnghhosehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsvggrnhhjtgesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghpsegrlhhivghnkedruggv X-GND-Sasl: jeanmichel.hautbois@yoseli.org On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 05:06:52PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 at 19:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > Replacing the macros by static inline functions should fix that. > > Thanks. I've done that now. Any comments on the rest of this? > I have a few things like implementing jump labels, a vDSO to get > around the sys_get_thread_area() bottleneck to come after this. Hi Daniel, It would be great to have vDSO at least for sys_get_thread_area() ! I implemented something, but if you already have it, please, submit a RFC I will test on coldfire ! Thanks, JM > Cheers, > > Daniel