From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: add allocation size check in blkdev_pr_read_keys()
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 23:46:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUEOWFY3d3vsA1EI@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216051147.12818-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:41:47AM +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> blkdev_pr_read_keys() takes num_keys from userspace and uses it to
> calculate the allocation size for keys_info via struct_size(). While
> there is a check for SIZE_MAX (integer overflow), there is no upper
> bound validation on the allocation size itself.
>
> A malicious or buggy userspace can pass a large num_keys value that
> doesn't trigger overflow but still results in an excessive allocation
> attempt, causing a warning in the page allocator when the order exceeds
> MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
>
> Fix this by introducing PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM to limit the number of keys to
> a sane value. This makes the SIZE_MAX check redundant, so remove it.
> Also switch to kvzalloc/kvfree to handle larger allocations gracefully.
>
> Fixes: 22a1ffea5f80 ("block: add IOC_PR_READ_KEYS ioctl")
> Tested-by: syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=660d079d90f8a1baf54d
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251212013510.3576091-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v1]
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Added PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM (64K) limit instead of checking KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE
> - Removed redundant SIZE_MAX check
> - Switched to kvzalloc/kvfree
> ---
> block/ioctl.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index 61feed686418..98c4c7b9e7fe 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> #include "blk.h"
> #include "blk-crypto-internal.h"
>
> +#define PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM (1u << 16)
I think _NUM is redundant here. Also this should probably go into
the uapi header.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-16 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 5:11 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-12-16 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUEOWFY3d3vsA1EI@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®