From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC1D634B69B; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797991; cv=none; b=GpbQsJZNJfmDXTFNKb/BX5NZknBPJIEQB0SCuPmKlu5j0gw6HBjxaVrLaB3ccMhMw+mV/OaNeotCp9GjgnEeXxD5ajWGWRomyOSkgbAIL1fkMvzc9zA8SdLsYNlCyjyZLm33Zp6AgfuBdeZFoy9eFfT2rGuvUhW6kHV6+SLmWv4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GrqwaVxJit4I+3H3NeOdXRRa2eK5ehxcCZyYjmwwaR0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NAejFc20ruckRWSMQZIgr9zYYKScpjixWo8nm9wjtUWX9wFn+8eZ4iOmYDbWsUIZ5P8xrGoZ1NxvV4EvheDU+JYSjByQPxdWDcScE2iS21uuo94/cBHfAmG//KBZZIfLhxavhmI8Kh1kL1JHOY7kCnEn4SYc2/UF2noRqH6MPLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=B7zU+UF9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="B7zU+UF9" Received: from gaggiata.pivistrello.it (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 29C5D1FCF8; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:59:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1767797985; bh=U+WG1uqp/mIp/jw01xLWkBFkADo2dKW6MLb9zwqaoqs=; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=B7zU+UF93+NgfPvU/awOLkcXnG8bGCNBAFS9B8SUUCF25s5e6QK8L5PS7rSgu8XJ1 ifkB16yaYydEPI6Ljijcc6MK9KhZEdcKCrqdIt+lzPYqMKMnDdm/PZ4orAm+rJV78m pB90Wo+mSJCf/yC03DK7Bpmewq2aXimVMRT+roU9cy/6gBg531VvFakT+ByWn81Sz6 CK0NObXvE4TBKnLKcFVKfPXlku51IpX9V7XMv2RCnXS3KQB2zIIQaYvz8/4DLGX5JY 819j6F6pB5Qt1hbwmgiruYCf2GMxQRuD6gnHxBHg8QdFd2Zisik84V3dHvKv3OMqNF BgFrqyEBzOpXA== Received: by gaggiata.pivistrello.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D84787F9F8; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:59:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:59:44 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Brian Norris , Francesco Dolcini , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: Allocate dev name earlier for interface workqueue name Message-ID: References: <20260107092744.1131314-1-wenst@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260107092744.1131314-1-wenst@chromium.org> On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 05:27:40PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The interface specific workqueues are allocated with the interface name > as part of the workqueue name. However when they are allocated, the > interface name has not been allocated, thus the "name" is actually the > pattern for the name "mlan%d". This ends up pretty ugly and could > conflict if multiple interfaces were added. > > Allocate the device name earlier and use that to allocate the > workqueues. Also tweak the workqueue name patterns to add a separator > between the prefix and the interface name parts for readability. Is there any impact on this approach when/if the interface is renamed from userspace? Francesco