From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BADD26056E; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768213428; cv=none; b=q+Lpnnru8BXabb3zpTg4Pm+3Bvhe2v9MmVPRUhR5gUP2QNnokVu+DI6nZpjCDFWS1axj+Xc4TqgqYoT38hBpIkghE+z4oV9R9jSYSJFh5Ff1z+UTKQAN76aMX4Ot4BBHMOwz+7YJX6ce6Noa/UFz+9wMDW1QIAAPrH60vBCXYBY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768213428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oq/dBq+sMVyQsnQ8soreeBF/WRBQ5XFG6Iu5BXSJuRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RyuWcUlEys7dLvzqC7QEzAYl6Qcdn67iSXJyMHv2JKcqDL5fo2wtRuLeVAma8Rwt6fCFnIt7SWInyC+4pQpqM2LEZIEnrIczkybEKqki2tUBBYGx1kgCnjZURnOFMIcS4U1uHhIXhdQ15XWWude9y9bpa1CAJ8TzKY5lLrAAJGE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=JLqXmkhd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="JLqXmkhd" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 5FE9E107EC8; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:23:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1768213418; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=oBlmPUXB26Mx6VEtRz8Z2TblJ6BO6m/Tan7ORdyIoVI=; b=JLqXmkhdfzPNRMYIu3tmZ50P08K6Gv0mN7QjVfOxTtQylVZujQTAX8znmAD4DO7rafaF7H K/TPkY2pth6sSOpg1Ldcat2wdq8suFqFbhIN/EeMpiYQ0u6MMYIrEujWVHZv58rr07F+eg 4RXC91moHwxUaipc0LgXWplSubmOi84o5YMd9JBE2d6BVqqcexs2TvN0KTy02k+OLbd/Wh dTYditZOcO9fZ8l2BmPv9S2IRNcMNlv4XA7WtEDaqRtIWJ6V28Td24FX6RvenQvixYk6HC C7Hz4SEDRmf1JXbPuN+zAeqDaBZlFvaEkgyIKWWsTF2x4JGbbNB7Fkfn92OdEg== Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:23:32 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 0/5] 6.18.5-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20260109111950.344681501@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0j/mh8o68GrT0swL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260109111950.344681501@linuxfoundation.org> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 --0j/mh8o68GrT0swL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! My denx address may no longer be available, please switch to pavel@nabladev.com . > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.5 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. We are getting failures on qemu: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1377239 https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/126711= 90285 https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/2= 253660286 Not sure if it is real problem or just something wrong with test configuration. 6.18.4 had similar problem iirc. I'm cc-ing our testing people, maybe they'll help. Best regards, Pavel --=20 In cooperation with Nabla. --0j/mh8o68GrT0swL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCaWTLpAAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8r7uAKCUBmcX7N/3YQcICbPgLgdUuGz70wCcCxXBgHtCNu9iS6UFDJOk7/KOXtw= =7fcV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0j/mh8o68GrT0swL--