From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A57315D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768317944; cv=none; b=avonB+V8Gi0m9oVvZubSnTH7ClCBdSwZD9VyLpG9sG3rjytT3HFQpTv3HFHxv3OqT38uC/C1Ibber8GNqtnXREXIXv3cSiLl3Ez1FoEny2D0JHp5xs+5+NcCk0ozoqSJUoNHZsoPipTwnSOfOTBAB1FLvgbAhAwri6LhMDSIkAg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768317944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VB8xKnXnSIWhXQwdEL9wgRdqiTnF5culbPOmvUZlvVA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BMwJL6O7SDLkeSXsMrAZY8ZA0atuQCSFqj5ULfMtKzud5Dd9agJDC4QtjUl76e5D69zdt9CkRjytg+sHYKxE4NaLQ0xO9wOacyJLZBERMwHDhGIvoGETYpy9eRDRMKAWGfUAIxWq7p+try5VhvaoW/laIkGXPXWvkApU03r8e/g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=HQLI2XHG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="HQLI2XHG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=5JX8 I944vOf0miWVEpuB8Fx/vVescgzjqKFm8m4hKuA=; b=HQLI2XHGlGdI3qVUbcVL GcW5zz9XUYHF5uREKFQXtzqE9GoVGLUBOiq55aDUSqtN+igGCQx2MD7bbwxif/MF je0czBWxOxexCGqFkSCREdnt2ucQtOhWlj3aEXLuxrle3uZLw5JMIFuWroEUwZ+Y d1V/9ZTIzJWeSMqbPqz4ItLhCrmG0cy0oDsmQuVpRuqyLiYYzpVxEGgKbs8niHet JvzFXgLzLRg6f8QSKMrZBEhye/09odcAZURWczfoKJuVqe6fvfinIOBVlcGBqvvA db9MWPeluBJ86qol16j40vZMufC9QI0i4Cb45B/w5yKFhYNtFh3ew5sCbmB3bkhL zQ== Received: (qmail 1750804 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2026 16:25:37 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 13 Jan 2026 16:25:37 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@GtaBmkZIFJIujnvx Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:25:35 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Marcus Folkesson Cc: Peter Rosin , Michael Hennerich , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/5] I2C Mux per channel bus speed Message-ID: References: <20251202-i2c-mux-v3-0-877dcf478a9f@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Marcus, > This series has been in its final shape for a while now. > With multiple resends and pings on this series for the last four > months, I think everyone interested has had the chance to review it. So, if there are interested parties, please add tags like Rev-by or Tested-by. Makes my life a lot easier. Currently, the core parts here are unreviewed. > Wolfram Sang, could you please take a look on this series and consider > pick it up for merging? I do respect the work you put into this. However, I am super busy and maintaining I2C is largely free-time work, so I can't give you any promise. Believe me, I wish it would be different. All the best, Wolfram