From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AFEA31AF2C for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769090149; cv=none; b=L9ZNx3/cKZF53T/K2slpYSf3iMBYt2wgAYtKfr96q9RI3xuRWkfYZ4Ef5M8yQXXTyGtbiZqTrqCK1s5AVNziGNBWFRFid68vBVr3njbhDr0XUgSoe6Q7zirF0eb75Rhly1N7gTa20r5BlC1w9/C/Cz2n0uh9iKqHzyKwJjI4cew= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769090149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2nXcGNysBiBdRcr6vy4ZStKKh5dYZxcbpIG7VnXq8as=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=d3SpKOdXsQ5isz+GQ2BH6jUWYt5/C4P0bg69yVoqkTAgP8Oa+WR68EFHO0ykWFl/t9wyr25BKrcv/lS5WNfoVfA03FB0Mbs5bay+rEKwYFPcBLs45KMCqxMidQGquMHeMds7kmkZ2B8tlh63nCItLa1w40w/RZqJYL01Mw5pzew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=R8epaApq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=mn8wNyGS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="R8epaApq"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="mn8wNyGS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1769090146; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F3Df56peZRg7yuOoU4r9j2z63CMqum3dw8Q62JAWFUY=; b=R8epaApqU+zzfCY4u4zDJq0HQUb7ZADqMoHziHS6+pmBgLrink174RCwRrngTGaoMIG0Y1 HnD+JeOnY+gX/NxjcBq8dOTFTWpPuhCfA7DVD1h4iw/WAOMfiFk1bx/UKQJsvWSgqxngK7 pz7XNYbyTzmBcU4iDAFuHTwapBdEIUo= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-550-OBCl0isJOUGZKhfaUuUbWQ-1; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:55:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OBCl0isJOUGZKhfaUuUbWQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: OBCl0isJOUGZKhfaUuUbWQ_1769090144 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4358f90fe8dso673729f8f.0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:55:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1769090143; x=1769694943; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F3Df56peZRg7yuOoU4r9j2z63CMqum3dw8Q62JAWFUY=; b=mn8wNyGShfiU8zpLqqW1CJz3jW5+8fjwrYCHmBWgOVC4SJO3MbAFX2tfxro+yd5QDm 0JLhe+vvs1qJcHtRo5lchGrgx2BOnItYppZYoOf1ejrjs0iqcwJKkfjVOnvok/iEi/86 p00hhClju5EurMCdnC9TmH/KoYzMejAKc6UDpOHrcqhLVEgKNXCgjZvesK6pkPmZv0nP 9HQLX/OsK0ZRDVboJL7NcCOJBhUDrGOiOPRo763osNssreWFXsqpCbvstinNRJlH5wzo RWu6dp12WnWtsVWBSIq9UrDeqfpnl38BDw726f1wR+ee8TSY3Fzc4yagJg0gWUo+5IuG GlHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769090143; x=1769694943; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F3Df56peZRg7yuOoU4r9j2z63CMqum3dw8Q62JAWFUY=; b=AcSjiq1KNSLJPyax7z8QaAU1HH5mKTO4jXAZXSUsK9wZJ7Ge2YQulLBSs/vvjUpeZC dlX6yupigBo/lqLzQrvkd45V3drQRfjVkcKRVzWDFypmbU3NJi0iviQOYHQ3GsJ/onfm 8G7+FDo1ADrFuzop56NUN27VhkBaABQb3X7I+QAHKpe481FEbzmWhCHNmRXhFS7xWIR1 otLLtpegZJleowezVYJnCr5QHYqQ4k42O+fQwTK6gARNfsqAK90DLIAicBTwbSyQzsAG cuw0WySHOuBnBBqSrWFFrsSD5Z0sd3OOBa9eS9uSkRdYVKtIOSqziKFJLKfRTA0uf7tb De+A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVlaz4bKIMfgUZtx4Ax8AaKXxk3Sekgfl3bOjGj5MIdk8+IRA2b1Y7DqLb/tWAL7jt2PlZiSR67Oqeo3vg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxb7uQWHzJz7U6cHa0QkXW+uOYCM00zciMTa3bjN4wa0EeWcyaG dancQyb9mzCpvYv/n1oSKBujAnbg7MzEdBei3+Hr74tpc0SEeqQJoHyJKYNb5zZo/e9RbOPrSul NHtFBQqPzBqL/41fX+qYqZQwqLAHK9GOj6q6/71/304h/xekzjC7GXaVUeEAb4/SD2w== X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aKpQNfd+1mKoaZYjnCa0pOIRnxk+++mETNiqiDQIQfoLdkErX+ssKpELpz4/1W ur1fzK3PVtr3hd+IUEOJBDp8SER2tmhCYjQjzRpWlWQok/lWx32S/G96Zs3Yz3QBy/Tr2ISVLBt IR13WXx+bRdK8g41qc5dTPGHP4XpUuMZrNyyHIS5tchoPIlXnKklDPAlP//csVRtyplgpBs3NId idcHtVNGk3U9kniUTeLn/mdqw0I0u2b2b33b87YqEcEM2YnRg76nZxrtwWIpPleDdb6HrVQZ3UR MwxAy0yMvLjD3VnnNVpxda1xQUZpmFw8CosdkINHUcgwXZdkm1OtOM5TZSuISDOpoGQQwNYLfQc Ib3K7DJCzkFWDT5U6l7dJzZ9PIAC6JGQk5S/2vAoSGbe9ItUBAlxlPi+SXR0= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f812:0:b0:435:9e32:2b85 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-435a5ff993cmr4488739f8f.29.1769090143513; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:55:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f812:0:b0:435:9e32:2b85 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-435a5ff993cmr4488677f8f.29.1769090143056; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgarzare-redhat (host-82-53-134-58.retail.telecomitalia.it. [82.53.134.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4359333b924sm18095487f8f.13.2026.01.22.05.55.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:55:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:55:36 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Bobby Eshleman Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , Xuan Zhuo , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Bryan Tan , Vishnu Dasa , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Shuah Khan , Long Li , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, berrange@redhat.com, Sargun Dhillon , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v16 00/12] vsock: add namespace support to vhost-vsock and loopback Message-ID: References: <20260121-vsock-vmtest-v16-0-2859a7512097@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260121-vsock-vmtest-v16-0-2859a7512097@meta.com> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 02:11:40PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >This series adds namespace support to vhost-vsock and loopback. It does >not add namespaces to any of the other guest transports (virtio-vsock, >hyperv, or vmci). > >The current revision supports two modes: local and global. Local >mode is complete isolation of namespaces, while global mode is complete >sharing between namespaces of CIDs (the original behavior). > >The mode is set using the parent namespace's >/proc/sys/net/vsock/child_ns_mode and inherited when a new namespace is >created. The mode of the current namespace can be queried by reading >/proc/sys/net/vsock/ns_mode. The mode can not change after the namespace >has been created. > >Modes are per-netns. This allows a system to configure namespaces >independently (some may share CIDs, others are completely isolated). >This also supports future possible mixed use cases, where there may be >namespaces in global mode spinning up VMs while there are mixed mode >namespaces that provide services to the VMs, but are not allowed to >allocate from the global CID pool (this mode is not implemented in this >series). > >Additionally, added tests for the new namespace features: > >tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh >1..25 >ok 1 vm_server_host_client >ok 2 vm_client_host_server >ok 3 vm_loopback >ok 4 ns_host_vsock_ns_mode_ok >ok 5 ns_host_vsock_child_ns_mode_ok >ok 6 ns_global_same_cid_fails >ok 7 ns_local_same_cid_ok >ok 8 ns_global_local_same_cid_ok >ok 9 ns_local_global_same_cid_ok >ok 10 ns_diff_global_host_connect_to_global_vm_ok >ok 11 ns_diff_global_host_connect_to_local_vm_fails >ok 12 ns_diff_global_vm_connect_to_global_host_ok >ok 13 ns_diff_global_vm_connect_to_local_host_fails >ok 14 ns_diff_local_host_connect_to_local_vm_fails >ok 15 ns_diff_local_vm_connect_to_local_host_fails >ok 16 ns_diff_global_to_local_loopback_local_fails >ok 17 ns_diff_local_to_global_loopback_fails >ok 18 ns_diff_local_to_local_loopback_fails >ok 19 ns_diff_global_to_global_loopback_ok >ok 20 ns_same_local_loopback_ok >ok 21 ns_same_local_host_connect_to_local_vm_ok >ok 22 ns_same_local_vm_connect_to_local_host_ok >ok 23 ns_delete_vm_ok >ok 24 ns_delete_host_ok >ok 25 ns_delete_both_ok >SUMMARY: PASS=25 SKIP=0 FAIL=0 > >Thanks again for everyone's help and reviews! Thank you for your hard work and patience! I think we've come up with an excellent solution that's also not too invasive. All the patches have my R-b, I've double-checked and tested this v16. Everything seems to be working fine (famous last words xD). So this series is good to go IMO! Next step should be to update the vsock(7) namespace. Thanks, Stefano