From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Address -debuginfo build regression with RPM < 4.20.0
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:11:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aY8wyR572eZYWVJY@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210-kbuild-fix-debuginfo-rpm-v1-0-0730b92b14bc@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 12:04:47AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>Steve reported a build issue with commit 62089b804895 ("kbuild: rpm-pkg:
>Generate debuginfo package manually") on RHEL9, which has an older
>version of RPM than what I tested. Turns out that RPM 4.20.0 fixed an
>issue with specifying %files for a -debuginfo subpackage.
>
>The first patch restricts the new -debuginfo package generation process
>to CONFIG_MODULE_SIG=y and RPM >= 4.20.0 to ensure it is actually
>necessary and working. The second patch restores the original -debuginfo
>package generation process from commit a7c699d090a1 ("kbuild: rpm-pkg:
>build a debuginfo RPM") when CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is disabled to keep the
>-debuginfo package around for older versions of RPM.
Yeah, I had similar issue on Fedora 42 (RPM version 4.20.1) and this
series fixed my issue.
>
>---
>Nathan Chancellor (2):
> kbuild: rpm-pkg: Restrict manual debug package creation
> kernel: rpm-pkg: Restore find-debuginfo.sh approach to -debuginfo package
>
> scripts/package/kernel.spec | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> scripts/package/mkspec | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>---
>base-commit: 05f7e89ab9731565d8a62e3b5d1ec206485eeb0b
>change-id: 20260209-kbuild-fix-debuginfo-rpm-718f81dbcaa6
Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 7:04 Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-10 7:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Restrict manual debug package creation Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-10 7:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel: rpm-pkg: Restore find-debuginfo.sh approach to -debuginfo package Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-11 20:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Address -debuginfo build regression with RPM < 4.20.0 Nicolas Schier
2026-02-13 14:11 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-02-13 17:34 ` Steve French
2026-02-13 19:11 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-13 19:41 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-15 21:29 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-16 8:25 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-16 11:42 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-16 14:03 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-18 20:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aY8wyR572eZYWVJY@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®