From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix NULL pointer deref and warnings during scx teardown
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 10:52:04 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYEOdPEkgA2eUcTE@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYDy-tCqsH990lW9@gpd4>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 07:54:50PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> I'm able to reproduce the NULL pointer dereference in set_cpu_allowed_scx()
> quite easily running `stress-ng --race-sched 0` with an scx scheduler that
> is intentionally starving tasks, triggering a stall => disable.
>
> I think this is what's happening:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> __sched_setscheduler()
> task_rq_lock(p)
>
> next_class = __setscheduler_class()
> // next_class is ext_sched_class
> scx_disable_workfn()
> scx_set_enable_state(SCX_DISABLING)
>
> scx_task_iter_start()
> while ((p = next())) {
> ...
> p->sched_class = fair_sched_class
> ...
> }
> scx_task_iter_stop()
>
> synchronize_rcu()
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(scx_root, NULL)
>
> scoped_guard(sched_change, ...) {
> p->sched_class = next_class;
> // next_class is still ext_sched_class,
> // overwriting fair_sched_class!
> }
> // Guard ends, calls sched_change_end()
> // switching_to_scx() called
> // scx_root == NULL => returns early
>
> task_rq_unlock(p)
>
> sched_setaffinity(p)
> set_cpus_allowed_scx()
> sch = scx_root; // scx_root == NULL => BUG!
Does the following patch fix the issue?
Thanks.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 136b01950a62..1fc2b358a175 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -4234,7 +4234,13 @@ static void scx_disable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
* Here, every runnable task is guaranteed to make forward progress and
* we can safely use blocking synchronization constructs. Actually
* disable ops.
+ *
+ * Wait for all CPUs to observe %SCX_DISABLING. Otherwise,
+ * task_should_scx() can see %SCX_ENABLED and __sched_setscheduler() put
+ * a task into sched_ext while we're migrating tasks out below.
*/
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
mutex_lock(&scx_enable_mutex);
static_branch_disable(&__scx_switched_all);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 15:13 Andrea Righi
2026-02-02 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2026-02-02 18:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-02-02 20:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-02-02 22:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-02-03 14:01 ` Andrea Righi
2026-02-04 20:08 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYEOdPEkgA2eUcTE@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome