From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36493A0EAA; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770195993; cv=none; b=kGKyXc/BJKXxCkOItfznbKwSvj3Nvce3mYKf1PDKZwhBzMkSqf+OsvfTdUZL4iWp5lS8lEFBQYfzbkUcW0DSGNGt6LA4oyDWcTf90CPABAO2mXQC4n9qsmvAvNiEioxjb2Tvt3aeDpde1iF1y5cqJW3tOUqLXkfqRZquRpwE/E4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770195993; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LFPO4C23K7OoNSgXRpJHswJquymHaqFVqV8EhvfrOO8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=r6jXZwbHxUWAQr6NXmj/n/PNBwhL3hDIlzcVBsi02UVALEuu4khzAznnPEdoPpyBNXvzX5378H5xabtconV60sLVuqCvId9lclUbxRQT1gUMI3qrTILSx9DdTFKnlK/bBGObUaGtZBC2/f84afsaY7DvTG5XSjv8mvkFBWeaGBc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=oFpR6ZYd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="oFpR6ZYd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770195993; x=1801731993; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=LFPO4C23K7OoNSgXRpJHswJquymHaqFVqV8EhvfrOO8=; b=oFpR6ZYdSeeq43EDRjaesIc/58MoQeWD6di064xox/IcsIr7tJmE3ZLU duOsY/FWMl71yhAEtNuxSVSNGbaanVB9jgPQRXq4hZrG3jXNxQ6YV6fAL j7axxuUXPusV3XBdJlhpnzgBsIDx0/Ct6DOlIHihetAx6xM1pOy9SZ/Sh cRJFmxpOsrqvWShZZTY+j/e4o+ZaZDl/K6UjopI/ZcFDp+R/j18LuP+5Q durn4l3Gj/7PkQgaeaBnbVezIe5D/E4qRteCLfQc6ysly/1aTmWdMmXfT KzHasVkpjZBTalHYyUdHSgF2tbdzKqOpFSe/Dp+1smXl08Cgblgp7P4IF Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OIZSch2NQMaaPMlhsKUgkw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GDEfA88nSii7W4jJm9aoeQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11691"; a="94032021" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,272,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="94032021" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2026 01:06:32 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6zHI9yqNRra81qGksnMc8g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pmuFWp8US6mups3l7WIsrA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,272,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="210160815" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.188]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2026 01:06:29 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:06:26 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Chuck Lever , NeilBrown , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] sunrpc: Fix compilation error (`make W=1`) when dprintk() is no-op Message-ID: References: <20260204010415.2149607-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 at 02:11, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 02:04:15AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > Definitely. I tried something similar a few years ago[1], but ran into build > errors from the robots, and gave up due to lack of time. For the matter of fact, I also get into errors from LKP (I compiled only part of this, need to enable more to cover these cases). > So for the principle: > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thanks, I will do more tests and fixes and add your Ack. > Ah, my local tree still has the following fix I never sent out, and still > looks suboptimal: Right, thanks for sharing, it's the same call robots are not okay with. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko