From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] iomap: fix race between iomap_set_range_uptodate and folio_end_read
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 03:11:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYvzUihKhMfM6agz@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnrk1aPs2J_EerLROxtiHAKTyU2NHBkRXpS=-yunEsC9epAWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 02:18:06PM -0800, Joanne Koong wrote:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ifs->state_lock, flags);
> - uptodate = ifs_set_range_uptodate(folio, ifs, off, len);
> + /*
> + * If a read is in progress, we must NOT call
> folio_mark_uptodate.
> + * The read completion path (iomap_finish_folio_read or
> + * iomap_read_end) will call folio_end_read() which uses XOR
> + * semantics to set the uptodate bit. If we set it here, the XOR
> + * in folio_end_read() will clear it, leaving the folio not
> + * uptodate.
> + */
> + uptodate = ifs_set_range_uptodate(folio, ifs, off, len) &&
> + !ifs->read_bytes_pending;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ifs->state_lock, flags);
This can't possibly be the right fix. There's some horrible confusion
here. It should not be possible to have read bytes pending _and_ the
entire folio be uptodate. That's an invariant that should always be
maintained.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250926002609.1302233-13-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
2025-12-23 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Sasha Levin
2025-12-23 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Sasha Levin
2025-12-24 1:12 ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-24 1:31 ` Sasha Levin
2026-02-07 7:16 ` Wei Gao
2026-02-09 19:08 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-10 0:12 ` Wei Gao
2026-02-10 0:20 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-10 0:40 ` Wei Gao
2026-02-10 22:18 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-11 0:00 ` Sasha Levin
2026-02-11 3:11 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-02-11 19:33 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-11 21:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-11 23:13 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-12 19:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-13 0:53 ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-24 2:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-24 15:43 ` Sasha Levin
2025-12-24 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-24 21:21 ` Sasha Levin
2025-12-30 0:58 ` Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYvzUihKhMfM6agz@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®