From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: kishon@kernel.org, jdmason@kudzu.us, mani@kernel.org,
dave.jiang@intel.com, allenbh@gmail.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Exclude reserved slots from db_valid_mask
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 15:55:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ9hy9RKR5pblGSc@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224133459.1741537-5-den@valinux.co.jp>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 10:34:53PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> In pci-epf-vntb, db_count represents the total number of doorbell slots
> exposed to the peer, including:
> - slot #0 reserved for link events, and
> - slot #1 historically unused (kept for compatibility).
>
> Only the remaining slots correspond to actual doorbell bits. The current
> db_valid_mask() exposes all slots as valid doorbells.
>
> Limit db_valid_mask() to the real doorbell bits by returning
> BIT_ULL(db_count - 2) - 1, and guard against db_count < 2.
>
> Fixes: e35f56bb0330 ("PCI: endpoint: Support NTB transfer between RC and EP")
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> index cbce50afc4dc..2eb3db035644 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> @@ -1269,7 +1269,10 @@ static int vntb_epf_peer_mw_count(struct ntb_dev *ntb)
>
> static u64 vntb_epf_db_valid_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb)
> {
> - return BIT_ULL(ntb_ndev(ntb)->db_count) - 1;
> + if (ntb_ndev(ntb)->db_count < 2)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return BIT_ULL(ntb_ndev(ntb)->db_count - 2) - 1;
> }
>
> static int vntb_epf_db_set_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 db_bits)
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-25 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 13:34 [PATCH 00/10] NTB: epf: Enable per-doorbell bit handling while keeping legacy offset Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Document legacy MSI doorbell offset Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:34 ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Defer pci_epc_raise_irq() out of atomic context Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:36 ` Frank Li
2026-02-26 1:02 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-27 7:32 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Report 0-based doorbell vector via ntb_db_event() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:54 ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Exclude reserved slots from db_valid_mask Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:55 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Implement db_vector_count/mask for doorbells Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:02 ` Frank Li
2026-02-27 6:23 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] NTB: epf: Document legacy doorbell slot offset in ntb_epf_peer_db_set() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:46 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-25 21:03 ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] NTB: epf: Make db_valid_mask cover only real doorbell bits Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:47 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-26 3:24 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:07 ` Frank Li
2026-02-26 1:25 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] NTB: epf: Report 0-based doorbell vector via ntb_db_event() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:59 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-26 3:17 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:09 ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] NTB: epf: Fix doorbell bitmask handling in db_read/db_clear Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 17:04 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-25 21:11 ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] NTB: epf: Implement db_vector_count/mask for doorbells Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 17:09 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-25 21:13 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ9hy9RKR5pblGSc@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®