Re: [RFT PATCH] tee: shm: Remove refcounting of kernel pages

[Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 12:01:55PM +0100, Sven Püschel wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
> 
> On 2/13/26 12:33 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > 
> > Earlier TEE subsystem assumed to refcount all the memory pages to be
> > shared with TEE implementation to be refcounted. However, the slab
> > allocations within the kernel don't allow refcounting kernel pages.
> > 
> > It is rather better to trust the kernel clients to not free pages while
> > being shared with TEE implementation. Hence, remove refcounting of kernel
> > pages from register_shm_helper() API.
> > 
> > Fixes: b9c0e49abfca ("mm: decline to manipulate the refcount on a slab page")
> > Reported-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > Reported-by: Sven Püschel <s.pueschel@pengutronix.de>
> > Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 29 +----------------------------
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
> > index 4a47de4bb2e5..54e2ba3afb25 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
> > @@ -23,29 +23,11 @@ struct tee_shm_dma_mem {
> >   	struct page *page;
> >   };
> > -static void shm_put_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count)
> > -{
> > -	size_t n;
> > -
> > -	for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++)
> > -		put_page(pages[n]);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void shm_get_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count)
> > -{
> > -	size_t n;
> > -
> > -	for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++)
> > -		get_page(pages[n]);
> > -}
> > -
> >   static void release_registered_pages(struct tee_shm *shm)
> >   {
> >   	if (shm->pages) {
> >   		if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED)
> >   			unpin_user_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
> > -		else
> > -			shm_put_kernel_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
> >   		kfree(shm->pages);
> >   	}
> > @@ -477,13 +459,6 @@ register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, struct iov_iter *iter, u32 flags,
> >   		goto err_put_shm_pages;
> >   	}
> > -	/*
> > -	 * iov_iter_extract_kvec_pages does not get reference on the pages,
> > -	 * get a reference on them.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (iov_iter_is_kvec(iter))
> > -		shm_get_kernel_pages(shm->pages, num_pages);
> > -
> >   	shm->offset = off;
> >   	shm->size = len;
> >   	shm->num_pages = num_pages;
> > @@ -497,10 +472,8 @@ register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, struct iov_iter *iter, u32 flags,
> >   	return shm;
> >   err_put_shm_pages:
> > -	if (!iov_iter_is_kvec(iter))
> > +	if (iter_is_uvec(iter))
> 
> I've replaced (due to compile failures noted by the kernel test robot) this
> with the compiler suggested iter_is_iovec . I haven't checked, if this is
> the correct fix.
> 
> With this patch applied (on the upstream commit 970296997869), my reported
> stacktrace/warning doesn't occur anymore. I didn't do any extensive testing,
> but creating and using a trusted key with keyctl worked fine in my short
> test.

Thanks for testing it out, I have fixed the compiler error in v2 here [1]. Can
you help to retest with a proper tested by tag?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260220084959.1966771-1-sumit.garg@kernel.org/

-Sumit

> 
> Sincerely
>     Sven
> 
> >   		unpin_user_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
> > -	else
> > -		shm_put_kernel_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
> >   err_free_shm_pages:
> >   	kfree(shm->pages);
> >   err_free_shm: