From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6951347FE1 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 07:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772956100; cv=none; b=XSqpWM81uVVSJSFvFjpeu/cZ8FhAmQ3xIvBSwb3CESHXL8Av0Bx29LBgvEvV5XB9biCIz5bnA4VBJHGv6ousQA8PXoe+2IIcbN9ax2uqSyxWUcuS7SreX+IOSSo87trPdNjIsLblK133m/QV8CKP/4ZhfQXqTAM4nokT4/E5Tog= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772956100; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3LUfbrub5xrNyLuVDuyydai4i/KIB5cM44TXzbrWd54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CHyw7dblL7V2cwIHlViCYoGEPScDYG7MAA7oqmQgyYXq0OTYbrgLV4IGWPthKA3iXgAk60af3L+AjRhcXfX6bwSGK/irs6iChZt89FF61DnoFJ0xtFcD43domGamLeTePZYgrkzbQA4f42RAYgQGrrQSrpf4WBVJJAxqe+6Vtwg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=D/7bATJi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D/7bATJi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49D61C116C6; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 07:48:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772956100; bh=3LUfbrub5xrNyLuVDuyydai4i/KIB5cM44TXzbrWd54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D/7bATJi/2MrAaR0ZI5/YW9LfhJyWS7miDzdxTWPGxZyeZt5Px+Wy0GQfbqNy+YwY tc6/ykql0hvMRiQwpeAQ//iZNGxM0ZoM1+b6RoTm1/hr505+wijCKLfJUpldIqlCe9 1MQ3Cj4fy+A5NSVuc72FnwLCQuwY7/EE6MReZpDh1tdgcFb89E8Bm5zobDzR9RZEr+ H0+4VvUFrPNNCtvJQoqs67myhLghZHw4ihREaLJtgDbHjDc2pi8JBQyAnirKZc76tQ /68F2MVbKy54fXxUmQ/JxiHt0KkxwIo5d7QeX6jhB1Gf6owT54RDkpLnec8FQs2EHy pgPti6gtmzX1A== Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 21:48:19 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: David CARLIER Cc: David Vernet , Andrea Righi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Use READ_ONCE() for the read side of dsq->seq update Message-ID: References: <20260307233204.30749-1-devnexen@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 04:22:09AM +0000, David CARLIER wrote: > I missed that both reads are under dsq->lock ... it was a wrong > analysis on my part. Sorry for the noise. Please stop sending patches that you don't fully understand or prove. It wouldn't have taken you a lot of effort to see whether this patch was correct or not. Instead, you shifted unnecessary work to me. This doesn't help. Thanks. -- tejun