Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: Use effective affinity mask for IRQ selection

[Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>]

On 04/06/2026 15:57, Fushuai Wang wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> From: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
> 
> When an SF is created after a CPU has been taken offline, the IRQ pool may
> contain IRQs with affinity masks that include the offline CPU. Since only
> online CPUs should be considered for IRQ placement, cpumask_subset() check
> would fail because the iter_mask contains offline CPUs that are not present
> in req_mask, causing SF creation to fail.

can you please add the example/repro from the prev discussion?
Sorry I wasn't clear I want it the commit message...

> 
> Use irq_get_effective_affinity_mask() instead, which returns the IRQ's
> actual effective affinity that already excludes offline CPUs.
> 
> Fixes: 061f5b23588a ("net/mlx5: SF, Use all available cpu for setting cpu affinity")
> Suggested-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
> index 994fe83da4be..c5d784cbc8e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
> @@ -105,9 +105,12 @@ irq_pool_find_least_loaded(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, const struct cpumask *req
> 
>          lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
>          xa_for_each_range(&pool->irqs, index, iter, start, end) {
> -               struct cpumask *iter_mask = mlx5_irq_get_affinity_mask(iter);
> +               const struct cpumask *iter_mask;
>                  int iter_refcount = mlx5_irq_read_locked(iter);

can you please keep revers xmas tree here as well?

> 
> +               iter_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(mlx5_irq_get_irq(iter));
> +               if (!iter_mask)
> +                       continue;
>                  if (!cpumask_subset(iter_mask, req_mask))
>                          /* skip IRQs with a mask which is not subset of req_mask */
>                          continue;
> --
> 2.36.1
>