From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753319AbYEEEVZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:21:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751236AbYEEEVR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:21:17 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:6067 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750815AbYEEEVR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 00:21:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ecvM6IzEaBVuyjFO4LZztAQZkjB2yYwpPE49DMDeuPlE9L3uiW4X5SdkYAdgAchJ5YiLo/hs8QBisKxWnaAt2TjZZgOx+5rzhQxOFu7In+0yFhYuqwjKUhwf0TUajYvSmyO4lo80rlxd57sPrAR9CF7cI3bmv+FHcqO/4J8t3Fs= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 08:21:15 +0400 From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" To: "Paul Jackson" Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: x86-64defconfig remake Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080504181359.a39d766b.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080504155719.GA6842@cvg> <20080504181359.a39d766b.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Paul Jackson wrote: > Cyrill wrote: > > The current x86_64_defconfig contains a number of nonexistent > > symbols. > > These symbols don't exist in what context? > > The one I notice: > > > -# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set > > certainly exists, in init/Kconfig: > > config CPUSETS > bool "Cpuset support" > depends on SMP && CGROUPS > > and is enabled by default in some configs: > > arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig > arch/mips/configs/ip27_defconfig > arch/mips/configs/sb1250-swarm_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configs/cell_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configspseries_defconfig > > I could be tempted to enable cpusets by default in x86_64 > as well, however I don't understand the tradeoffs of such > a change well enough to know if I should propose that. > > -- > I won't rest till it's the best ... > Programmer, Linux Scalability > Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 > Thanks Paul for feedback, will take a look today evening.