From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753229AbYIJGCu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:02:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751722AbYIJGCl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:02:41 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:64496 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751707AbYIJGCl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:02:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=GGySSOarEEl6nviugD0szdgNl7opU3BE9gHgRjP89ormVoikm50KYnwjyDePEiY1iy 9dlfCa9/ROa5e60ZnuFBvoDMn3AyZqaxLKB1pN7pZ+c45nqNXV3j8QyvC8zfv3XhPt3j ajvvmah/LnHiVmEjYAzrJSjGh/S8rMgulzYg0= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:02:40 +0400 From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" To: "Yinghai Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: io-apic - get rid of __DO_ACTION macro Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , LKML In-Reply-To: <86802c440809091313l6b3e1f48x6e3b5cd0b948ccf9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080909184615.GA7303@lenovo> <86802c440809091313l6b3e1f48x6e3b5cd0b948ccf9@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: ... > > hope we can keep using MACRO.. > > YH > Btw, Yinghai, what does it mean? To not touch this macro at all? Or you mean about implementation issue (ie the design itself)?