From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753966AbYJaGP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:15:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752826AbYJaGPK (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:15:10 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]:51270 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752798AbYJaGPI (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:15:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QEOOwCEn9QC+jjZDzrPZy+GpBts+/RC4Ctmi1e4zeCKX9UOmyJqbUwtoVRQTyIGbTF AhA6IMxTSo+dzfODKW8Qeh2wMsz0lZ6OsnzaRBzIu2mGKkN5lVcHgAMSg3xWXUDwfeoC pMQCjYZMn/lnqezGIYNrLs1xxAeD7rBE3IKJQ= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:15:07 +0300 From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by 2ae111cdd8d83ebf9de72e36e68a8c84b6ebbeea Cc: "James Bottomley" , "Thomas Gleixner" , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1225400664.19324.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081030220653.GK30303@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * James Bottomley wrote: >> >>> >From bd011c0cc51ce1fbab95403a570a8b47ad6ba500 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: James Bottomley >>> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:19:49 -0500 >>> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: Fix subarch compile breakage >>> >>> commit 2ae111cdd8d83ebf9de72e36e68a8c84b6ebbeea >>> Author: Cyrill Gorcunov >>> Date: Mon Aug 11 18:34:08 2008 +0400 >>> >>> x86: apic interrupts - move assignments to irqinit_32.c, v2 >>> >>> Wrongly moved irq2 setup out of the mach-default/setup.c file. This >>> causes a breakage on voyager which needs its own version. Fix by >>> moving it back again. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c | 12 ------------ >>> arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c >>> index 845aa98..3928784 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c >>> @@ -81,15 +81,6 @@ void __init init_ISA_irqs (void) >>> } >>> } >>> >>> -/* >>> - * IRQ2 is cascade interrupt to second interrupt controller >>> - */ >>> -static struct irqaction irq2 = { >>> - .handler = no_action, >>> - .mask = CPU_MASK_NONE, >>> - .name = "cascade", >>> -}; >>> - >>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq) = { >>> [0 ... IRQ0_VECTOR - 1] = -1, >>> [IRQ0_VECTOR] = 0, >>> @@ -167,9 +158,6 @@ void __init native_init_IRQ(void) >>> alloc_intr_gate(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR, thermal_interrupt); >>> #endif >>> >>> - if (!acpi_ioapic) >>> - setup_irq(2, &irq2); >>> - >>> /* setup after call gates are initialised (usually add in >>> * the architecture specific gates) >>> */ >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c b/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c >>> index 37b9ae4..53b4202 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c >>> @@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ void __init pre_intr_init_hook(void) >>> init_ISA_irqs(); >>> } >>> >>> +/* >>> + * IRQ2 is cascade interrupt to second interrupt controller >>> + */ >>> +static struct irqaction irq2 = { >>> + .handler = no_action, >>> + .mask = CPU_MASK_NONE, >>> + .name = "cascade", >>> +}; >>> + >>> /** >>> * intr_init_hook - post gate setup interrupt initialisation >>> * >>> @@ -53,6 +62,9 @@ void __init intr_init_hook(void) >>> if (x86_quirks->arch_intr_init()) >>> return; >>> } >>> + if (!acpi_ioapic) >>> + setup_irq(2, &irq2); >>> + >>> } >> >> hm, this change looks backwards (doubly so ;-). >> >> Is the build problem caused by the lack of the acpi_ioapic flag on >> Voyager? >> >> Ingo >> > > Thanks for report, cant get access to sources right now -- will check it later. > Btw James, what the build bug message was? Could you post it please?