mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:38:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa79d98a1002100238v256ca6daw5e00c8b6d8dc4bb6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265796732.11509.260.camel@laptop>

On 2/10/10, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 01:39 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
>
>> Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> =====================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/apic.h>
>> +#include <asm/perf_p4.h>
>>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>>  #include <asm/nmi.h>
>>
>> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>>  	u64		max_period;
>>  	u64		intel_ctrl;
>>  	int		(*hw_config)(struct perf_event_attr *attr, struct hw_perf_event
>> *hwc);
>> +	int		(*schedule_events)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign,
>> int cpu);
>>  	void		(*enable_bts)(u64 config);
>>  	void		(*disable_bts)(void);
>>
>
>> +/*
>> + * This is the most important routine of Netburst PMU actually
>> + * and need a huge speedup!
>> + */
>> +static int p4_pmu_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int
>> *assign, int cpu)
>> +{
>
>> +}
>
>
>> -static int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int
>> *assign)
>> +/* we don't use cpu argument here at all */
>> +static int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int
>> *assign, int cpu)
>>  {
>>  	struct event_constraint *c, *constraints[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
>>  	unsigned long used_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
>
>
>> @@ -1796,7 +2305,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_ev
>>  	if (n < 0)
>>  		return n;
>>
>> -	ret = x86_schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign);
>> +	ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign, 0);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  	/*
>
> This look like a bug, surely we can run on !cpu0.

Definitely! Thanks! It should be smp_processor_id()

>
>> @@ -2313,7 +2822,7 @@ int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_e
>>  	if (n0 < 0)
>>  		return n0;
>>
>> -	ret = x86_schedule_events(cpuc, n0, assign);
>> +	ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n0, assign, cpu);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>
>
> I'd try BUG_ON(cpu != smp_processor_id()) and scrap passing that cpu
> thing around.
>

no, i need cpu to find out if event has migrated from other thread and
then i switch
some thread dependant flags in hw::config (ie escr and cccr), or i
miss something and events in one cpu just can't migrate to another
cpu?

>> @@ -2700,6 +3232,7 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
>>  {
>>  	struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
>>  	struct cpu_hw_events *fake_cpuc;
>> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>  	int ret, n;
>>
>>  	ret = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -2725,7 +3258,7 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
>>
>>  	fake_cpuc->n_events = n;
>>
>> -	ret = x86_schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL);
>> +	ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL, cpu);
>>
>>  out_free:
>>  	kfree(fake_cpuc);
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-10 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-08 18:45 Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-08 21:56 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-09  4:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-09  6:54   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-09 22:39   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-10 10:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-10 10:38       ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-02-10 10:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-10 11:23           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-11 12:21           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-11 15:22             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-26 10:25             ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events: Simplify code by removing cpu argument to hw_perf_group_sched_in() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-09  4:23 ` [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft Paul Mackerras
2010-02-09  6:57   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-09  8:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-09 21:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-02-09 21:35   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-15 20:11 ` Robert Richter
2010-02-15 20:32   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-17 22:14   ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa79d98a1002100238v256ca6daw5e00c8b6d8dc4bb6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®