From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851BDEB64DD for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 08:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231800AbjHIIEG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 04:04:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229835AbjHIIEF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 04:04:05 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 417 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 01:04:04 PDT Received: from forward502a.mail.yandex.net (forward502a.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:500:1:45:d181:d502]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217979F; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 01:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-67.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-67.vla.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c15:2c95:0:640:f90:0]) by forward502a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8C1025EC41; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:56:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-67.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id vuTatqBWuOs0-Hh7wC64C; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 10:56:58 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1691567818; bh=YDBk0KjQh1HzWuh0Dn/kXGmLDEsk4jPretTZd8jrNcY=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Cc:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=Klvyi2pEWgIVNQ8vbrf0jldMARt81cx4SDQ3yguOP5JrQPp5Jesz7semU/6BzrjMW c/EJk1KUvW34WiaFKd8g5SJmm/394hla3o7QFDEIIjMK7eXGSLIguTZWaE8j0q0VQT UJC2wrXoTh9tSHuvWw3/xO1IawcXQ3FYNs1BpA1Y= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-67.vla.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:56:56 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: add OFD lock tests Content-Language: en-US To: Chuck Lever III Cc: Jeff Layton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , Christian Brauner , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Shuah Khan , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" References: <20230621152214.2720319-1-stsp2@yandex.ru> <20230621152214.2720319-3-stsp2@yandex.ru> <4db7c65bee0739fe7983059296cfc95f20647fa3.camel@kernel.org> <7bbb29d2-4cae-48bd-1b97-9f4dbf6ffb19@yandex.ru> <8F45F47C-86C0-472E-B701-001A4FF90DBC@oracle.com> From: stsp In-Reply-To: <8F45F47C-86C0-472E-B701-001A4FF90DBC@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 22.06.2023 21:58, Chuck Lever III пишет: > IMO that's not a reason not to do this properly. > > You should work with Jeff and the maintainer of > xfstests to make it happen. If only I knew who is that maintainer and why he ignores all patches... Can someone else please take a look at this: https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg23115.html and make a review/ack?